Background of Section 101 or patent eligibility issue Ever since Alice (2014), the USPTO and the courts have to a large extent invalidated software patents. Also, the USPTO has had a significantly lower than average patent allowance rate for software inventions. The reason is that Alice caused the courts and the USPTO to treat many software inventions as though they were … [Read more...]
Before filing a patent application
Before filing a patent application, among other activities, you must make sure that you own the patent rights, it is eligible for patent protection and also new and non-obvious. Browse related articles below.
In Helsinn Healthcare v. Teva Pharmaceuticals (Fed. Cir. 5/1/17), the Federal Circuit held that under the America Invents Act (AIA), if the existence of the sale is public, the details of the invention need not be publicly disclosed for the on sale bar to apply. The Federal Circuit made clear that to the extent that the existence of an offer for sale of the invention is public, … [Read more...]
In the past few years software patent protection have come under intense scrutiny by the courts and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). In that short time, it has become commonplace to see software inventions characterized as an abstract idea and thus not eligible for patent protection under 35 U.S.C. 101. As such, for software patent protection, one must … [Read more...]
Brief history of patentable subject matter rejections Ever since Alice/Mayo, a number of decisions have been rendered regarding patentable subject matter or 35 USC 101. In other words, whether a claim in a patent or patent application is eligible for patent protection under Section 101. Each new case adds to the body of patentable subject matter case law to help the … [Read more...]
Scriptpro LLC v. Innovation Associates, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2016) is an opinion that provides pointers on how to write a patent application based on a few of the arguments that were presented by the defendant attempting to invalidate the patent, specifically, failure to satisfy the written description requirement. By anticipating these types of arguments, it may mitigate potential … [Read more...]