OC Patent Lawyer Orange County Patent Lawyer welcomes clients in the Orange County region, recommends cost efficient patent protection strategy

Subscribe Form

Receive Blog Updates

Published by: James Yang

Adjusting Patent Term Due to Delays

Generally, the basic term of a patent is either 20 years from the filing date of the patent application or 17 years from the issue date of the patent whichever is greater.  However, there are many variations from the basic term.  For example, the patent term for a continuation patent is calculated not from its [...]

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Print This Post Print This Post   

Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications

After an inventor conceives of an invention, an application seeking patent protection may be filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The first or initial patent application may either be a provisional or non provisional patent application.
The provisional patent application is described as a lower cost option compared to the non-provisional patent application. [...]

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Print This Post Print This Post   

Disclose Information Related to Your Invention

After a patent application is filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, each individual involved with the patent application has a duty to disclose information that is material to the patentability of the invention.  Failure to disclose all material information coupled with an intent to mislead the Patent Office may jeopardize the validity [...]

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Print This Post Print This Post   

Rescission of Proposed Rules to Continuation and Claims Practice

The rules regarding continuation practice and claim practice which were proposed and would have been implemented in 2007 have been enjoined ever since. On September 21, 2009, the Patent Office with GlaxoSmithKline and Dr. Tafas filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal and vacate the judgment of the district court since the Patent Office [...]

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Print This Post Print This Post   

Safe Harbor Provision for Divisional Patent Applications

The patent statute (35 USC § 121) indicates that divisional patent applications cannot be receive a double patenting rejection based on claims of a parent application. This is commonly known as the safe harbor provision of Section 121.
The following case illustrates whether the safe harbor applies to a patent application that is a divisional in [...]

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 3.00 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Print This Post Print This Post   

Specific Intent Required for Active Inducement of Patent Infringement

Liability for patent infringement may arise directly or indirectly. For direct patent infringement liability, a defendant makes, uses, sells, offers for sale or imports a product that infringes a patent. For indirect patent infringement liability, the accused actor is assisting someone else in directly infringing a patent either by inducing them to infringe or by [...]

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Print This Post Print This Post