This blog post has been updated due to the America Invents Act enacted September 16, 2011. See Virtual patent marking and false patent marking post. Upon filing a patent application or issuance of a patent, a product disclosed by the patent application or covered by the claims of the issued patent may be marked either “Patent [...]
-
Penalty for False Patent Marking
-
Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
After an inventor conceives of an invention, an application seeking patent protection may be filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The first or initial patent application may either be a provisional or non provisional patent application. The provisional patent application is described as a lower cost option compared to the non-provisional patent [...]
-
What Types of Inventions are Obvious?
Inventors frequently ask whether the Patent Office will grant them a patent on their invention. The general answer is that the Patent Office will grant a patent on inventions that are novel (i.e., new) and non-obvious in light of technology existing at the time the patent application was filed. The government does not have an [...]
Are methods for doing business eligible for patent protection?
Yes. In a recent case, the United States Supreme Court held that business methods are eligible for patent protection. Bilski v. Kappos (2010). However, it was a close call since the 9 Supreme Court Justices were divided 5-4 in the decision. . The Bilski case involved a method for hedging risk. Although the justices agreed [...]
Print This Post
- Posted in: Uncategorized
- Continue Reading →
Most Inventions Eligible for Patent Protection
The claim section is the most important part of the patent. The claims define the buondaries of patent protection afforded under the patent and the Patent Office. The claims are also reviewed by the courts and compared to the prior art to determine whether the claimed invention is novel and non-obviousness and thus valid and [...]
Print This Post
- Posted in: Uncategorized
- Continue Reading →
Combine Claim Elements to Avoid Infringement
Claim drafting is one of the harder aspects of preparing a patent application. The reason is that the patent attorney must balance broad claim langauge and avoiding the prior art. A broad claim is desireable because competitors will have difficulty designing around your patent, should one issue. However, broader claims are also subject to [...]
Print This Post
- Posted in: Uncategorized
- Continue Reading →
Claim Drafting Tries to Balance Breadth and Validity
In a patent, broader claims are generally more desireable. However, the breadth of the claim must be balanced with its validity. If the claim is too broad, then the courts will hold that the claimed invention is anticipated by the prior art or an obvious variant of the prior art. If the claim is too [...]
Print This Post
- Posted in: design around, invalidity
- Continue Reading →
After Acquired Companies Fall Under Existing License
A patent provides the right to exclude others from practicing the patented invention. In other words, a patentee can demand that competitors stop selling a device that infringes on the patent. This is the traditional offensive aspect of a patent. However, patents have other purposes. For example, when a company is accused of infringement, the [...]
Print This Post
- Posted in: Uncategorized
- Continue Reading →
Comparable Licenses Used to Establish Reasonable Royalty Rate
A patentee can seek money damages and/or an injunction against companies that infringe their patent. Damages are calculated as the dollar value that the patentee suffered due to the infringement. However, in certain situations, the patentee may not have suffered any damage or the damage suffered by the patentee was de minimus. For example, the [...]
Print This Post
- Posted in: Uncategorized
- Continue Reading →
Submit New Evidence in Appeal from USPTO
You file a patent application. You go through a couple of rounds with the examiner but are unsuccesful in obtaining a patent grant. You appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“BPAI”) arguing that the examiner is incorrect. At this point, you’ve gone through a lot but there is still more you can [...]
Print This Post
- Posted in: Uncategorized
- Continue Reading →
Liability From Third Party False Marking
This blog post has been updated due to the America Invents Act enacted September 16, 2011. See Virtual patent marking and false patent marking post. . Patent false marking has become an increasingly important issue for patentees. The typical false marking situation begins with a product manufacturer falsely marking its “own” product with an expired patent [...]
Print This Post
- Posted in: false marking, patent marking
- Continue Reading →
Patent Ownership Issues Involving Your Ex-Spouse
Problems may arise when a patent is invented by two or more parties without addressing the issues of control or ownership of the patent. The issue is that each of the inventors can exploit the patent without sharing any profits with the other inventors. Also, any one of the inventors can dedicate the patent to [...]
Print This Post
- Posted in: ownership
- Continue Reading →
Trade Secret Exception to Section 16600
California has a strong public policy that allows employees to change jobs, seek employment, or otherwise practice their trade or skill. This policy is embodied in Business and Professions Code Section 16600 (“Section 16600”). Under Section 16600, all contracts that restrain an employee’s ability to work are void unless the contract is based on a [...]
Print This Post
- Posted in: Uncategorized
- Continue Reading →







