• Home
  • About
    • Client Reviews
    • Patent Samples
    • Accolades
    • About Firm
    • Technologies
    • FAQs
    • Areas Served
  • Services
    • Patents
      • Patent Consultation
      • Patent Search Service
      • Patent Application Service
      • Patent Prosecution
      • Utility Patents
      • Design Patents
      • Patent Defense
      • Patent Enforcement
      • Working with In-House Attorneys
    • Trademarks
      • Trademark Search
      • Trademark Application Services
      • Trademark Prosecution
      • Trademark Enforcement
      • Trademark Defense
    • Licensing
    • Worldwide IP
    • Risk Management
    • Due Diligence
  • Industries
    • Browse Patent Samples
    • Automotive Patents
    • Construction Patents
    • Consumer Products Patents
    • Electronics Patents
    • Food, Beverage, & Other Culinary Patents
    • Manufacturing Patents
    • Medical Products & Devices Patents
    • Optics Patents
    • Software & App Patents
    • Tools & Equipment Patents
  • Learning Resources
    • First-Time Inventor?
    • Why Patent Your Invention in a Bad Economy?
    • Videos on Patents
    • Search 180+ Articles
      • Patent process
        • Overview of Patent Process
          • Patent process timeline and major milestones
          • Patent Process: Invention to Patent Granted (Simplified)
          • Patent process, overall steps and procedures
        • Overview of the examination process within the USPTO
          • Highs and lows of securing patent protection for your invention
          • What is the Patent Office procedure after filing a patent application?
        • Benefits of a Patent Search
          • What is a patent search and How to do it?
        • Patent attorneys, agents and the USPTO can help with the patent process
        • USPTO Website
      • Invention Agreements
        • What is an NDA and when to use them?
        • How to use a contract to protect your invention?
        • Working with others without losing your IP rights
        • Patent Assignments for Independent Contractors
        • Losing Invention Rights When Hiring or Collaborating with Others
        • Avoid Problems: Get an Invention Assignment Agreement
      • Protect Inventions
        • Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
        • Do you need to get your patent attorney to sign an NDA?
        • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
        • Four types of intellectual property to protect your idea and how to use them
          • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
          • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
          • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
          • Benefits of Patent Protection
          • Best uses for design patents
        • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
          • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
          • File a patent application before telling others about the invention
        • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
          • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
        • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
          • What is a continuation patent application?
      • How Patent Applications Work: the Basics
        • How to respond to an office action?
        • Request for non-publication of a patent application
        • Anatomy of a Patent Document
        • How to write a broad patent application?
        • Design patents: pros and cons
      • Patent costs
        • How much does it cost to get a utility patent?
        • Provisional Patent Application: Cheap Alternative?
        • Patent Cost Framework and cash flow
        • Provisional patent application: a cheap option?
        • Cheap provisional patent applications
      • Patent infringement
        • Basics of writing a patent claim for a patent application
        • Patent Marking: Everything you wanted to know
        • Avoiding Patent Infringement
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product?
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product? (Design Patent)
      • Worldwide patents
        • Pros and cons of securing worldwide patent protection and their steps
        • Foreign patent filing to secure protection in other countries
      • Responding to Office Actions
        • Overview of Office Actions
      • Trademarks
        • Trademark Registration: common law, state and federal
        • How to obtain a federal trademark registration?
        • How to select a trademark?
          • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Info on Forms
    • Nonpublication Request
    • Declaration of Utility or Design Application
    • Provisional Patent Application Cover Sheet
    • After Final Consideration Pilot Program
  • Schedule Consultation
  • Contact

Top-Rated Orange County Patent Lawyer | Helping Inventors in Orange County, Los Angeles County & Beyond | OC Patent Lawyer, Irvine CA

Orange County Patent Attorney

(949) 433-0900
You are here: Home / Protect Inventions / Abstract idea hard to define for patent eligibility purposes

Abstract idea hard to define for patent eligibility purposes

November 17, 2014 by James Yang

StruggleUnder U.S. patent laws, an invention must be directed to a statutory category that is eligible for patent protection. These categories include a process, a machine, a manufacture or a composition of matter. (35 USC § 101). If the invention does not fall within one of these four enumerated categories, that is, if an application claims an abstract idea, a natural phenomenon, or a law of nature, then it cannot be patented. Over the past few years, the Supreme Court has rendered a number of opinions relating to the eligibility of an invention for patent protection. However, these opinions are open to different interpretations which create tension in the patent system. Part of the tension lies in the struggle to define an abstract idea for the purposes of determining whether the invention is eligible for patent protection.

In Buysafe v. Google (Fed. Cir. 2014), the claimed invention was directed to a computer implemented method for facilitating a third party guarantee of a financial transaction. The Federal Circuit held, without much analysis, that the invention recited in the claims was directed to an abstract idea, and thus not eligible for patent protection. The Federal Circuit stated that:

The claims in this case do not push or even test the boundaries of the Supreme Court precedents under Section 101. The claims are squarely about creating a contractual relationship – a transaction performance guaranty” – that is beyond question of ancient lineage. … The claims thus are directed to an abstract idea. (emphasis added).

The Federal Circuit appears to suggest that all things ancient are abstract. However, old ideas and old innovations are typically identified as prior art, not as abstract ideas.

Although the two judges who decided this case thought that the invention was an abstract idea, other believed otherwise. The examiner also believed that the claimed invention was not an abstract idea, because otherwise, the examiner woulnd’t have allowed the case to issue as a patent. Judge Rader, who heard oral arguments for this case but retired from the bench before the opinion was written, hinted during oral arguments that the invention might not be an abstract idea. (See link here). As such, other reasonable minds such as the examiner and possibly Ret. Judge Rader thought differently. A well-reasoned explanation may be necessary, rather than merely stating that the abstractness of the invention was so clear on its face that no explanation was necessary.

In deciding this case, the Federal Circuit reviewed the Supreme Court decision in Alice v. CLS. As of this writing, the decision is the law of the land with respect to the subject-matter eligibility of a claimed invention. However, the Federal Circuit’s application of the legal holding in the Alice decision appears to add a physicality requirement, stating that:

A claim is ineligible for patent protection if (a) it is “directed to” matter in one of the three excluded categories and (b) “the additional elements” do not supply an “inventive concept” in the physical realm – that ensures that the patent is on something “significantly more than” the ineligible matter itself.

The Alice opinion did not refer to any requirement that the “something more” be within the physical realm. A physicality requirement may make the Section 101 analysis easier by excluding all non-physical inventions, but it would likely exclude inventions valuable to the forward progress of science.

For now, most of the Section 101 subject matter eligibility cases revolve around software and other narrow categories of cases. For example, in this case, the invention concerned contractual relationships. However, although Section 101 cases have been limited to certain limited situations, this does not mean that, over time, these Section 101 issues will not spill over to other more traditional arts (e.g., mechanical arts) where it has not been raised in the past.

Nonetheless, in the midst of this uncertainty, it may still be wise to file patent applications on software and other non-physical inventions. Those that keep on patenting software and other non- physical inventions could be in a good position once the dust settles in this area of patent law.

I invite you to contact me with your patent questions at (949) 433-0900. Please feel free to forward this article to your friends. As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities.

Related Articles for Protecting Inventions

  • Four types of intellectual property you can use to protect your idea and how to use them
  • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
  • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
  • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
  • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Patent attorney and getting them to sign a confidentiality agreement
  • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
  • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
  • Beware of marketing an invention before filing a patent application
  • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
  • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
  • Best uses for design patents
  • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
  • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
  • Benefits of Patent Protection
  • Continuation, divisional and continuation-in-part applications
  • Importance of Documenting the Invention
  • Abstract ideas require something more for patent protection
  • Abstract idea hard to define for patent eligibility purposes
  • USPTO Report On patent-eligible subject matter
  • Broad patents spread a wide net but more likely to be invalid
  • Misconceptions of provisional patent application


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Author

James Yang is a patent attorney. For more than 16 years, James Yang has been representing clients to secure patent protection for their inventions and register trademarks to protect their brands. If you need help, call him at (949) 433-0900. Read More…

Popular Posts

  • Patent process overview
  • Patent process explained
  • How much does a patent cost?
  • Why patent your invention in a bad economy?

Patent Book

Navigating the Patent System - new book by Orange County patent attorney, James Yang

Navigating the Patent System: Learn the patent process and strategies to protect your invention

Read for Free
Buy at Amazon

RECEIVE PATENT ARTICLES

Stay up to date on major changes and get tips on the patent process.

We respect your privacy.

Popular Posts

Patent process overview
Patent process explained
How much does a patent cost?
Trademark process and costs
Patent process and costs

 

Services

Patent Consultations
Patent Searches
Patent Applications
Utility Patents
Design Patents
Patent Prosecution Services
Patent Defense Services
Patent-Law Counsel for In-House Attorneys
Trademark Overview
Trademark Search Services
Trademark Application Services
Trademark Prosecution Services
Trademark Enforcement Services
Trademark Defense Services
See All Services

Industries

Automotive Patents
Consumer Products Patents
Culinary Patents
Manufacturing Patents
Medical Patents
Optics Patents
Software & App Patents
See All Industries

Contact

James Yang
OC Patent Lawyer
2372 Morse Ave., Suite #178
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 433-0900

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Sitemaps

Sitemap: Pages | Sitemap: Posts

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

By accessing this blog, you agree that no attorney-client relationship is formed except by a subsequent written retainer agreement. Also, you agree to not send confidential information unless directed by me to do so. The information posted on this blog is legal information and not legal advice.
Complete Terms of Use
Complete Privacy Policy

ADA Compliance

OC Patent Lawyer aims to ensure that its services are accessible to people with disabilities.
Accessibility Statement

Service Area

From our office in Irvine, California, we serve clients throughout Orange County, Los Angeles, Long Beach, the Inland Empire (e.g. Corona and Temecula), and throughout SoCal.

© 2023 · James Yang, Your Entrepreneur and Mid-Size Business Patent Attorney