• Home
  • About
    • Client Reviews
    • Patent Samples
    • Accolades
    • About Firm
    • Technologies
    • FAQs
  • Services
    • Patent
      • Utility Patents
      • Design Patents
      • Patent Application
      • Patent Defense
      • Patent Enforcement
      • Working with In-House Attorneys
    • Trademark
      • Trademark Search
      • Trademark Application
      • Trademark Enforcement
      • Trademark Defense
    • Licensing
    • Worldwide IP
    • Risk Management
    • Due Diligence
  • Industries
    • Browse Patent Samples
    • Automotive Patents
    • Construction Patents
    • Consumer Products Patents
    • Electronics Patents
    • Food, Beverage, & Other Culinary Patents
    • Manufacturing Patents
    • Medical Products & Devices Patents
    • Optics Patents
    • Software & App Patents
    • Tools & Equipment Patents
  • Learning Resources
    • First-Time Inventor?
    • Why Patent Your Invention in a Bad Economy?
    • Videos on Patents
    • Search 180+ Articles
      • Patent process
        • Overview of Patent Process
          • Patent process timeline and major milestones
          • Patent Process: Invention to Patent Granted (Simplified)
          • Patent process, overall steps and procedures
        • Overview of the examination process within the USPTO
          • Highs and lows of securing patent protection for your invention
          • What is the Patent Office procedure after filing a patent application?
        • Benefits of a Patent Search
          • What is a patent search and How to do it?
        • Patent attorneys, agents and the USPTO can help with the patent process
        • USPTO Website
      • Invention Agreements
        • What is an NDA and when to use them?
        • How to use a contract to protect your invention?
        • Working with others without losing your IP rights
        • Patent Assignments for Independent Contractors
        • Losing Invention Rights When Hiring or Collaborating with Others
        • Avoid Problems: Get an Invention Assignment Agreement
      • Protect Inventions
        • Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
        • Do you need to get your patent attorney to sign an NDA?
        • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
        • Four types of intellectual property to protect your idea and how to use them
          • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
          • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
          • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
          • Benefits of Patent Protection
          • Best uses for design patents
        • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
          • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
          • File a patent application before telling others about the invention
        • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
          • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
        • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
          • What is a continuation patent application?
      • How Patent Applications Work: the Basics
        • How to respond to an office action?
        • Request for non-publication of a patent application
        • Anatomy of a Patent Document
        • How to write a broad patent application?
        • Design patents: pros and cons
      • Patent costs
        • How much does it cost to get a utility patent?
        • Provisional Patent Application: Cheap Alternative?
        • Patent Cost Framework and cash flow
        • Provisional patent application: a cheap option?
        • Cheap provisional patent applications
      • Patent infringement
        • Basics of writing a patent claim for a patent application
        • Patent Marking: Everything you wanted to know
        • Avoiding Patent Infringement
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product?
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product? (Design Patent)
      • Worldwide patents
        • Pros and cons of securing worldwide patent protection and their steps
        • Foreign patent filing to secure protection in other countries
      • Responding to Office Actions
        • Overview of Office Actions
      • Trademarks
        • Trademark Registration: common law, state and federal
        • How to obtain a federal trademark registration?
        • How to select a trademark?
          • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Schedule Consultation
  • Contact

Top-Rated Orange County Patent Lawyer | Helping Inventors in Orange County, Los Angeles County & Beyond | OC Patent Lawyer, Irvine CA

Orange County Patent Attorney

(949) 433-0900
You are here: Home / Patent Infringement / Benefit of post grant proceeding instead of patent litigation

Benefit of post grant proceeding instead of patent litigation

September 6, 2013 by James Yang

deceisionsThe America Invents Act (aka AIA) expands your options to challenge a patent after a patent has been granted.  For example, post grant review, inter-partes review and ex parte reexamination are all mechanisms available to you to challenge the validity of a patent at the USPTO level.  However, one factor in deciding not to challenge validity before the USPTO is that the AIA prevents you from raising an argument during litigation if that argument could have been raised during the proceeding at the USPTO.  If you don’t raise the argument in the post grant proceeding before the PTO but could have, then you are barred from raising the argument during litigation in federal court.  In other words, the Patent Office wants the best arguments presented.  Otherwise, you won’t get a second bite at the apple in court.

The following case illustrates one narrow instance where one might decide to challenge validity before the USPTO through one of the post grant proceedings instead of bringing an action in court.

In Redline v. Star (PTAB August 27, 2013), the Board held that assignor estoppel is not available as a defense during an inter partes reexamination at the USPTO.

Assignor estoppel is a doctrine raised by a patent owner (i.e., buyer) against a seller of the patent preventing the seller from attacking the validity of the patent in a subsequent patent infringement litigation case.  To explain, a company that owns patent rights may sell the patent rights to a different company.  The seller may later compete with the buyer.  The buyer of the patent may sue the seller (i.e., assignor) for patent infringement based on the patent that the seller sold.  In return, the seller will attack the validity of the patent since the seller may have intimate knowledge of information that could invalidate the patent.  This seems inherently unfair that the seller would receive money or other consideration from the buyer only to turn around and invalidate the patent.  As such, the courts prevent (i.e., estop) the seller making such invalidity arguments in a patent infringement case.

The Redline case held that the seller will not be estopped from attacking the validity of patent that he/she just sold to the buyer in proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the USPTO.  According to the PTAB, the AIA statute allows anyone to institute a post grant proceeding.  Also, since the post grant proceedings of the AIA relate to validity and not infringement, Assignor estoppel is not available to the buyer.  Assignor estoppel according to the PTAB is solely directed to infringement issues and not validity issues.  The post grant proceedings at the USPTO relate solely to invalidity, not infringement.  Hence, assignor estoppel is not available to the buyer at the USPTO.

The bottom line is that the seller can attack the validity of the patent before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the USPTO but the seller is still estopped at federal court from attacking the validity of the patent in a patent infringement case.  Accordingly, if the seller believes that invalidity is a significant argument in the case, then the seller should strongly consider the inability of the buyer from raising assignor estoppel before the PTAB of the USPTO when deciding whether to proceed before the PTAB of the USPTO or in federal courts.

I invite you to contact me with your patent questions at (949) 433-0900 or [email protected] Please feel free to forward this article to your friends. As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Author

James Yang is a patent attorney. For more than 16 years, James Yang has been representing clients to secure patent protection for their inventions and register trademarks to protect their brands. If you need help, call him at (949) 433-0900. Read More…

Popular Posts

  • Patent process overview
  • Patent process explained
  • How much does a patent cost?
  • Why patent your invention in a bad economy?

Patent Book

Navigating the Patent System - new book by Orange County patent attorney, James Yang

Navigating the Patent System: Learn the patent process and strategies to protect your invention

Read for Free
Buy at Amazon

RECEIVE PATENT ARTICLES

Stay up to date on major changes and get tips on the patent process.

We respect your privacy.

Popular Posts

Patent process overview
Patent process explained
How much does a patent cost?
Trademark process and costs
Patent process and costs

 

Services

Utility Patents
Design Patents
Patent Prosecution Services
Patent Defense Services
Patent-Law Counsel for In-House Attorneys
Trademark Prosecution Services
See All Services

Industries

Automotive Patents
Consumer Products Patents
Culinary Patents
Manufacturing Patents
Medical Patents
Optics Patents
Software & App Patents
See All Industries

Contact

James Yang
OC Patent Lawyer
2372 Morse Ave., Suite #178
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 433-0900

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Sitemaps

Sitemap: Pages | Sitemap: Posts

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

By accessing this blog, you agree that no attorney-client relationship is formed except by a subsequent written retainer agreement. Also, you agree to not send confidential information unless directed by me to do so. The information posted on this blog is legal information and not legal advice.
Complete Terms of Use
Complete Privacy Policy

ADA Compliance

OC Patent Lawyer aims to ensure that its services are accessible to people with disabilities.
Accessibility Statement

Service Area

From our office in Irvine, California, we serve clients from all areas within Orange County and Los Angeles County, California.

© 2023 · James Yang, Your Entrepreneur and Mid-Size Business Patent Attorney