• Home
  • About
    • Client Reviews
    • Patent Samples
    • Accolades
    • About Firm
    • Technologies
    • FAQs
  • Services
    • Patents
      • Patent Consultation
      • Patent Search Service
      • Patent Application Service
      • Patent Prosecution
      • Utility Patents
      • Design Patents
      • Patent Defense
      • Patent Enforcement
      • Working with In-House Attorneys
    • Trademarks
      • Trademark Search
      • Trademark Application Services
      • Trademark Prosecution
      • Trademark Enforcement
      • Trademark Defense
    • Licensing
    • Worldwide IP
    • Risk Management
    • Due Diligence
  • Industries
    • Browse Patent Samples
    • Automotive Patents
    • Construction Patents
    • Consumer Products Patents
    • Electronics Patents
    • Food, Beverage, & Other Culinary Patents
    • Manufacturing Patents
    • Medical Products & Devices Patents
    • Optics Patents
    • Software & App Patents
    • Tools & Equipment Patents
  • Learning Resources
    • First-Time Inventor?
    • Why Patent Your Invention in a Bad Economy?
    • Videos on Patents
    • Search 180+ Articles
      • Patent process
        • Overview of Patent Process
          • Patent process timeline and major milestones
          • Patent Process: Invention to Patent Granted (Simplified)
          • Patent process, overall steps and procedures
        • Overview of the examination process within the USPTO
          • Highs and lows of securing patent protection for your invention
          • What is the Patent Office procedure after filing a patent application?
        • Benefits of a Patent Search
          • What is a patent search and How to do it?
        • Patent attorneys, agents and the USPTO can help with the patent process
        • USPTO Website
      • Invention Agreements
        • What is an NDA and when to use them?
        • How to use a contract to protect your invention?
        • Working with others without losing your IP rights
        • Patent Assignments for Independent Contractors
        • Losing Invention Rights When Hiring or Collaborating with Others
        • Avoid Problems: Get an Invention Assignment Agreement
      • Protect Inventions
        • Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
        • Do you need to get your patent attorney to sign an NDA?
        • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
        • Four types of intellectual property to protect your idea and how to use them
          • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
          • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
          • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
          • Benefits of Patent Protection
          • Best uses for design patents
        • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
          • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
          • File a patent application before telling others about the invention
        • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
          • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
        • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
          • What is a continuation patent application?
      • How Patent Applications Work: the Basics
        • How to respond to an office action?
        • Request for non-publication of a patent application
        • Anatomy of a Patent Document
        • How to write a broad patent application?
        • Design patents: pros and cons
      • Patent costs
        • How much does it cost to get a utility patent?
        • Provisional Patent Application: Cheap Alternative?
        • Patent Cost Framework and cash flow
        • Provisional patent application: a cheap option?
        • Cheap provisional patent applications
      • Patent infringement
        • Basics of writing a patent claim for a patent application
        • Patent Marking: Everything you wanted to know
        • Avoiding Patent Infringement
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product?
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product? (Design Patent)
      • Worldwide patents
        • Pros and cons of securing worldwide patent protection and their steps
        • Foreign patent filing to secure protection in other countries
      • Responding to Office Actions
        • Overview of Office Actions
      • Trademarks
        • Trademark Registration: common law, state and federal
        • How to obtain a federal trademark registration?
        • How to select a trademark?
          • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Schedule Consultation
  • Contact

Top-Rated Orange County Patent Lawyer | Helping Inventors in Orange County, Los Angeles County & Beyond | OC Patent Lawyer, Irvine CA

Orange County Patent Attorney

(949) 433-0900
You are here: Home / Protect Inventions / Broad patents spread a wide net but more likely to be invalid

Broad patents spread a wide net but more likely to be invalid

November 18, 2014 by James Yang

Broad patents spread wide netIn Abbvie v. Janssen (Fed. Cir. 2014), the claims of the patents at issue defined the claimed invention by its function, rather than by its structure. To put it in layman’s terms, it claimed a sports car going 0 to 60 mph within X seconds instead of claiming a V-12 engine having certain technical features that enabled the car to reach 0-60 in so many seconds. Functional limitations relates to the end goal, whereas structural limitations relates to specific structure allowing your invention to achieve those end goals. Patent claims defined as functional limitations are broader than structural language because functional claiming covers all structures capable of achieving such function. In contrast, structural limitations are limited to the specific structure in the claim that performs the function. Other ways of performing the same function are not usually covered with structure specific limitations.

When prosecuting a patent application, it is generally more desireable to obtain broader patent coverage because competitors have a harder time designing things that avoid your patent claims. However, broad functional claims are also more susceptible to challenges based on invalidity, obviousness, written description and other attacks. Narrower claims may be viewed as less valuable or desireable. However, narrower claims tend to hold up to invalidity challenges better than very broad claims. Thus, one claiming strategy is to layer your claims so that the claim set has independent claims of varying scope. Also, the claim set should include claims specific for a particular desirable feature or structure as well as broader clalims.

In AbbVie, the defendant challenged AbbVie’s functional claim language, which was written very broadly. In particular, the defendant attacked the validity of the patent claims based on the written description requirement. “The essence of the written description requirement is that a patent applicant … must describe his or her invention so that the public will know … that he or she has truly made the invention.” By claiming the invention based on functional language, the patent owner is asserting that he/she has invented and deserves the right to an entire functionally-defined genus. Accordingly, by functionally claiming a genus, the patent applicant is spreading a very broad net. However, it is sometimes difficult to show that the patent applicant invented and deserves the right to the entire functionally defined genus.

In this case, the claims were directed to an antibody binding to human interleukin 12 (IL-12). The claims at issue recited:

  1. A neutralizing isolated human antibody, or antigen-binding portion thereof that binds to human IL-12 and disassociates from human IL-12 with a k rate constant of 1 x 10-2 s-1 or less, as determined by surface plasmon resonance.

The claim defines the invention by its “binding” function, not its chemical structure or molecular structure. To satisfy the written description requirement for this functionally defined genus, the specification or patent application “must demonstrate that the applicant has made a generic invention that achieves the claimed result and do so by showing that the applicant has invented a number of species sufficient to support a claim to the functionally-defined genus.” In other words, the patent application must include so many examples of the species in the genus as necessary to show that the inventor invented the entire spectrum of the functionally-claimed genus. The full scope of the claim must be adequately supported in the written description.

Here, the patent application described 300 different species and alleged that it disclosed all known species except for the species embodied in the defendant’s product. However, the court found that the 300 different species belong to only one type of antibody which was not similar to the defendant’s product in many different aspects (e.g., type of heavy and light chains, % sequence similarity to Joe-9 antibodies and other differences). Thus, the written description did not give examples covering the entire ranges of functionally claimed antibodies.

As such, the Federal Circuit affirmed the jury’s finding that the claim was invalid for failure to satisfy the written description requirement. The Federal Circuit looked qualitatively to the types of species disclosed in the specification, not to the raw quantitative number of species disclosed.

The court recognized that “functionally defined genus claims can be inherently vulnerable to invalidity challenge for lack of written description support, especially in technology fields that are highly unpredictable, where it is difficult to establish a correlation between structure and function for the whole genus or to predict what would be covered by the functionally claimed genus.” In other words, the patent application may contain a number of different examples but one can never be sure if they have included enough examples when the technology is unpredictable. Future technology could change the way that one achieves a function. If so, the inventor would not be allowed to claim the entire genus because the application did not cover the future technology. As such, functionally defined claims would always be subject to possible invalidity issues.

A sound claiming strategy would be to include both functionally defined claims as well as more narrow structurally defined claims directed to generally the same subject matter. Also, include narrow specific structurally defined claims directed to desirable features of the invention.

I invite you to contact me with your patent questions at (949) 433-0900. Please feel free to forward this article to your friends. As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities.

Related Articles for Protecting Inventions

  • Four types of intellectual property you can use to protect your idea and how to use them
  • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
  • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
  • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
  • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Patent attorney and getting them to sign a confidentiality agreement
  • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
  • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
  • Beware of marketing an invention before filing a patent application
  • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
  • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
  • Best uses for design patents
  • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
  • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
  • Benefits of Patent Protection
  • Continuation, divisional and continuation-in-part applications
  • Importance of Documenting the Invention
  • Abstract ideas require something more for patent protection
  • Abstract idea hard to define for patent eligibility purposes
  • USPTO Report On patent-eligible subject matter
  • Broad patents spread a wide net but more likely to be invalid
  • Misconceptions of provisional patent application


  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Author

James Yang is a patent attorney. For more than 16 years, James Yang has been representing clients to secure patent protection for their inventions and register trademarks to protect their brands. If you need help, call him at (949) 433-0900. Read More…

Popular Posts

  • Patent process overview
  • Patent process explained
  • How much does a patent cost?
  • Why patent your invention in a bad economy?

Patent Book

Navigating the Patent System - new book by Orange County patent attorney, James Yang

Navigating the Patent System: Learn the patent process and strategies to protect your invention

Read for Free
Buy at Amazon

RECEIVE PATENT ARTICLES

Stay up to date on major changes and get tips on the patent process.

We respect your privacy.

Popular Posts

Patent process overview
Patent process explained
How much does a patent cost?
Trademark process and costs
Patent process and costs

 

Services

Patent Consultations
Patent Searches
Patent Applications
Utility Patents
Design Patents
Patent Prosecution Services
Patent Defense Services
Patent-Law Counsel for In-House Attorneys
Trademark Overview
Trademark Search Services
Trademark Application Services
Trademark Prosecution Services
Trademark Enforcement Services
Trademark Defense Services
See All Services

Industries

Automotive Patents
Consumer Products Patents
Culinary Patents
Manufacturing Patents
Medical Patents
Optics Patents
Software & App Patents
See All Industries

Contact

James Yang
OC Patent Lawyer
2372 Morse Ave., Suite #178
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 433-0900

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Sitemaps

Sitemap: Pages | Sitemap: Posts

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

By accessing this blog, you agree that no attorney-client relationship is formed except by a subsequent written retainer agreement. Also, you agree to not send confidential information unless directed by me to do so. The information posted on this blog is legal information and not legal advice.
Complete Terms of Use
Complete Privacy Policy

ADA Compliance

OC Patent Lawyer aims to ensure that its services are accessible to people with disabilities.
Accessibility Statement

Service Area

From our office in Irvine, California, we serve clients from all areas within Orange County and Los Angeles County, California.

© 2023 · James Yang, Your Entrepreneur and Mid-Size Business Patent Attorney