• Home
  • About
    • Client Reviews
    • Patent Samples
    • Accolades
    • About Firm
    • Technologies
    • FAQs
  • Services
    • Patent
      • Utility Patents
      • Design Patents
      • Patent Application
      • Patent Defense
      • Patent Enforcement
      • Working with In-House Attorneys
    • Trademark
      • Trademark Search
      • Trademark Application
      • Trademark Enforcement
      • Trademark Defense
    • Licensing
    • Worldwide IP
    • Risk Management
    • Due Diligence
  • Industries
    • Browse Patent Samples
    • Automotive Patents
    • Construction Patents
    • Consumer Products Patents
    • Electronics Patents
    • Food, Beverage, & Other Culinary Patents
    • Manufacturing Patents
    • Medical Products & Devices Patents
    • Optics Patents
    • Software & App Patents
    • Tools & Equipment Patents
  • Learning Resources
    • First-Time Inventor?
    • Why Patent Your Invention in a Bad Economy?
    • Videos on Patents
    • Search 180+ Articles
      • Patent process
        • Overview of Patent Process
          • Patent process timeline and major milestones
          • Patent Process: Invention to Patent Granted (Simplified)
          • Patent process, overall steps and procedures
        • Overview of the examination process within the USPTO
          • Highs and lows of securing patent protection for your invention
          • What is the Patent Office procedure after filing a patent application?
        • Benefits of a Patent Search
          • What is a patent search and How to do it?
        • Patent attorneys, agents and the USPTO can help with the patent process
        • USPTO Website
      • Invention Agreements
        • What is an NDA and when to use them?
        • How to use a contract to protect your invention?
        • Working with others without losing your IP rights
        • Patent Assignments for Independent Contractors
        • Losing Invention Rights When Hiring or Collaborating with Others
        • Avoid Problems: Get an Invention Assignment Agreement
      • Protect Inventions
        • Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
        • Do you need to get your patent attorney to sign an NDA?
        • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
        • Four types of intellectual property to protect your idea and how to use them
          • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
          • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
          • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
          • Benefits of Patent Protection
          • Best uses for design patents
        • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
          • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
          • File a patent application before telling others about the invention
        • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
          • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
        • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
          • What is a continuation patent application?
      • How Patent Applications Work: the Basics
        • How to respond to an office action?
        • Request for non-publication of a patent application
        • Anatomy of a Patent Document
        • How to write a broad patent application?
        • Design patents: pros and cons
      • Patent costs
        • How much does it cost to get a utility patent?
        • Provisional Patent Application: Cheap Alternative?
        • Patent Cost Framework and cash flow
        • Provisional patent application: a cheap option?
        • Cheap provisional patent applications
      • Patent infringement
        • Basics of writing a patent claim for a patent application
        • Patent Marking: Everything you wanted to know
        • Avoiding Patent Infringement
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product?
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product? (Design Patent)
      • Worldwide patents
        • Pros and cons of securing worldwide patent protection and their steps
        • Foreign patent filing to secure protection in other countries
      • Responding to Office Actions
        • Overview of Office Actions
      • Trademarks
        • Trademark Registration: common law, state and federal
        • How to obtain a federal trademark registration?
        • How to select a trademark?
          • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Schedule Consultation
  • Contact

Top-Rated Orange County Patent Lawyer | Helping Inventors in Orange County, Los Angeles County & Beyond | OC Patent Lawyer, Irvine CA

Orange County Patent Attorney

(949) 433-0900
You are here: Home / Patent application process / Before filing a patent application / Claim drafting tip: Focus on direct, not indirect infringement

Claim drafting tip: Focus on direct, not indirect infringement

September 14, 2015 by James Yang

directBottom line: The claims of a patent should, if possible, be specifically and separately directed to each one of several entities within a distribution chain such as the end user, supplier, component supplier, or manufacturer so that each of these entities can be held liable for direct patent infringement.  This may be difficult and not possible to accomplish but it should be a goal during patent prosecution.

The reason for such a claim strategy is illustrated by the holding in JVC v. Nero (Fed. Cir. 2015) which limits a patent owner’s ability to collect damages from an entity within the distribution chain, for indirect patent infringement.  Hence, separate independent claims should be directed to each one of the different entities within the distribution chain so that each entity within the distribution chain can be separately held liable for direct patent infringement.

Under JVC and speaking in broad terms, a patent owner cannot sue an entity for indirect infringement for providing a key, non-staple component of a patented product or for inducing the infringement of another if that other person is a licensee of the patent owner. More specifically, the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court’s decision to grant summary judgment of non-infringement for Nero who provided software to copy media on Blu-ray and DVD-licensed discs. Simply put, JVC could not license its patents to disc manufacturers and then turn around and sue others for providing software for use with the licensed discs.  The reason stated by the court is that indirect patent infringement requires the identification of a direct infringer.  Licensees are not direct infringers.  Hence, no indirect patent infringement.

Indirect infringement comes in two different causes of action, namely, contributory patent infringement or inducement of patent infringement. In both actions, the defendant being sued for indirect infringement has not practiced the patent but has provided either a key component to another to practice the patent or by its actions has induced another to practice the patent.

In JVC, JVC held a number of pioneering patents related to the operation and use of DVD and Blu-ray players as well as their optical discs. JVC licensed these pioneering patents to all device manufacturers and optical disc manufacturers, and thus these patents became a part of the standard for DVD and Blu-ray devices and related optical discs.

Nero provided unlicensed software to end-users so that the DVD and Blu-ray players could be used to copy media onto licensed optical discs. JVC in turn sued Nero for indirect infringement. JVC alleged that the end users of the Blu-ray and DVD discs when using the Nero software necessarily practiced the claims of the patents by virtue of compliance of the DVD and Blu-ray discs to existing standards which comply with the JVC pioneering patents.

In other words, JVC stressed that:

“its theory of infringement is that end-users of Nero’s software when used with DVD and Blu-ray disc, comply with the DVD and Blu-ray standards to which the JVC patents are essential, whereby the end-users ‘must necessarily’ infringe the patents.”

In response, the District Court observed that:

“licensees cannot be infringers.” “Without specific allegations and evidence showing use of unlicensed optical discs [with the software], Nero has established a complete defense to all of JVC’s allegations of infringement under their patents.”

For this reason, where practical, it is preferred that the claims not be drafted to capture a potential defendant as an indirect infringer and instead that separate independent claims be drafted, each claim directed to one of the potential entities within a distribution model or technology ecosystem.  However, this goal may be difficult to obtain based on a variety of factors such as whether a method or apparatus claim is being sought, what the examiner will allow, whether there is a basis in the patent application for a claim directed to each of the entities up-and-down a distribution chain or within a technology ecosystem and whether the inventor can bear the costs associated with drafting and prosecuting the claims.

I invite you to contact me with your patent questions at (949) 433-0900. Please feel free to forward this article to your friends. As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego, and surrounding cities.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Author

James Yang is a patent attorney. For more than 16 years, James Yang has been representing clients to secure patent protection for their inventions and register trademarks to protect their brands. If you need help, call him at (949) 433-0900. Read More…

Popular Posts

  • Patent process overview
  • Patent process explained
  • How much does a patent cost?
  • Why patent your invention in a bad economy?

Patent Book

Navigating the Patent System - new book by Orange County patent attorney, James Yang

Navigating the Patent System: Learn the patent process and strategies to protect your invention

Read for Free
Buy at Amazon

RECEIVE PATENT ARTICLES

Stay up to date on major changes and get tips on the patent process.

We respect your privacy.

Popular Posts

Patent process overview
Patent process explained
How much does a patent cost?
Trademark process and costs
Patent process and costs

 

Services

Utility Patents
Design Patents
Patent Prosecution Services
Patent Defense Services
Patent-Law Counsel for In-House Attorneys
Trademark Prosecution Services
See All Services

Industries

Automotive Patents
Consumer Products Patents
Culinary Patents
Manufacturing Patents
Medical Patents
Optics Patents
Software & App Patents
See All Industries

Contact

James Yang
OC Patent Lawyer
2372 Morse Ave., Suite #178
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 433-0900

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Sitemaps

Sitemap: Pages | Sitemap: Posts

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

By accessing this blog, you agree that no attorney-client relationship is formed except by a subsequent written retainer agreement. Also, you agree to not send confidential information unless directed by me to do so. The information posted on this blog is legal information and not legal advice.
Complete Terms of Use
Complete Privacy Policy

ADA Compliance

OC Patent Lawyer aims to ensure that its services are accessible to people with disabilities.
Accessibility Statement

Service Area

From our office in Irvine, California, we serve clients from all areas within Orange County and Los Angeles County, California.

© 2023 · James Yang, Your Entrepreneur and Mid-Size Business Patent Attorney