• Home
  • About
    • Client Reviews
    • Patent Samples
    • Accolades
    • About Firm
    • Technologies
    • FAQs
  • Services
    • Patent
      • Utility Patents
      • Design Patents
      • Patent Application
      • Patent Defense
      • Patent Enforcement
      • Working with In-House Attorneys
    • Trademark
      • Trademark Search
      • Trademark Application
      • Trademark Enforcement
      • Trademark Defense
    • Licensing
    • Worldwide IP
    • Risk Management
    • Due Diligence
  • Industries
    • Browse Patent Samples
    • Automotive Patents
    • Construction Patents
    • Consumer Products Patents
    • Electronics Patents
    • Food, Beverage, & Other Culinary Patents
    • Manufacturing Patents
    • Medical Products & Devices Patents
    • Optics Patents
    • Software & App Patents
    • Tools & Equipment Patents
  • Learning Resources
    • First-Time Inventor?
    • Why Patent Your Invention in a Bad Economy?
    • Videos on Patents
    • Search 180+ Articles
      • Patent process
        • Overview of Patent Process
          • Patent process timeline and major milestones
          • Patent Process: Invention to Patent Granted (Simplified)
          • Patent process, overall steps and procedures
        • Overview of the examination process within the USPTO
          • Highs and lows of securing patent protection for your invention
          • What is the Patent Office procedure after filing a patent application?
        • Benefits of a Patent Search
          • What is a patent search and How to do it?
        • Patent attorneys, agents and the USPTO can help with the patent process
        • USPTO Website
      • Invention Agreements
        • What is an NDA and when to use them?
        • How to use a contract to protect your invention?
        • Working with others without losing your IP rights
        • Patent Assignments for Independent Contractors
        • Losing Invention Rights When Hiring or Collaborating with Others
        • Avoid Problems: Get an Invention Assignment Agreement
      • Protect Inventions
        • Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
        • Do you need to get your patent attorney to sign an NDA?
        • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
        • Four types of intellectual property to protect your idea and how to use them
          • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
          • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
          • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
          • Benefits of Patent Protection
          • Best uses for design patents
        • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
          • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
          • File a patent application before telling others about the invention
        • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
          • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
        • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
          • What is a continuation patent application?
      • How Patent Applications Work: the Basics
        • How to respond to an office action?
        • Request for non-publication of a patent application
        • Anatomy of a Patent Document
        • How to write a broad patent application?
        • Design patents: pros and cons
      • Patent costs
        • How much does it cost to get a utility patent?
        • Provisional Patent Application: Cheap Alternative?
        • Patent Cost Framework and cash flow
        • Provisional patent application: a cheap option?
        • Cheap provisional patent applications
      • Patent infringement
        • Basics of writing a patent claim for a patent application
        • Patent Marking: Everything you wanted to know
        • Avoiding Patent Infringement
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product?
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product? (Design Patent)
      • Worldwide patents
        • Pros and cons of securing worldwide patent protection and their steps
        • Foreign patent filing to secure protection in other countries
      • Responding to Office Actions
        • Overview of Office Actions
      • Trademarks
        • Trademark Registration: common law, state and federal
        • How to obtain a federal trademark registration?
        • How to select a trademark?
          • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Schedule Consultation
  • Contact

Top-Rated Orange County Patent Lawyer | Helping Inventors in Orange County, Los Angeles County & Beyond | OC Patent Lawyer, Irvine CA

Orange County Patent Attorney

(949) 433-0900
You are here: Home / Patent application process / After Filing a Patent Application / Earlier priority date given with passing reference in patent application

Earlier priority date given with passing reference in patent application

February 3, 2014 by James Yang

Priority DateFor important or keystone inventions, the initial patent application may expand to a number of further continuing applications (i.e., continuation, divisional, and continuation-in-part applications) which all relate back to the base parent patent application.  For example, the entrepreneur or company may develop additional features and aspects related to the base invention over the course of marketing the invention.  It may be prudent to add the new features (i.e., inventive subject matter) to the base parent patent application.  In these instances, subject matter which is common to both the first and second filed patent applications is afforded a priority date as of the filing date of the earlier filed first patent application.  However, the new subject matter introduced into the second patent application is only afforded a priority date as of the filing date of the later-filed second patent application.

In some situations, adding new inventive subject matter to the parent application may be detrimental to the overall strategy of protecting the invention.  For example, the term of the second patent may be reduced.  The term of the patent originating from the second patent application is calculated from the filing date of the earlier first filed patent application, instead of the filing date of the later filed second patent application.  Also, for those claims which are directed to new subject matter, the base parent application (i.e., first filed patent application) may be considered prior art and be used against the second filed patent application.

A.  Priority date is the primary dispute in EnOcean case

The issue in EnOcean v. Face Int’l. (Fed. Cir. Jan. 31, 2014) was related to the issue of priority dates for particular claims in EnOcean’s patent application.  The issue arose in the context of an interference which is a dispute as to who should be awarded the patent on an invention.  The opposing parties each had allowable claims directed to the same invention.  The party that can prove that he/she was the first to invent is awarded the patent.  EnOcean attempted to show that it invented the idea first based on an earlier filed patent application related to the patent application at issue by way of a claim of priority.  If the benefit of priority could relate back to its first filed patent application, then EnOcean would be awarded the patent.  If not, then Face would be awarded the patent.  As such, it was important for EnOceanto prove that the priority date of their claimed invention could relate back to the filing date of the first filed patent application and receive the benefit therefrom.  To do so, the claims in the second filed patent application must find support in the first filed patent application.

The priority date of claims in a second later filed patent application is afforded the filing date of the first filed patent application if the first filed patent application provides support.

B.  Mere passing reference in first filed patent application provides support to establish priority date

EnOcean utilized the term “means for receiving” and “receiver” in the claims of the second filed patent application.  To determine if the claims could claim priority back to the first filed patent application, the first filed patent application must provide support for “means for receiving” and “receiver” limitations.  Face argued that the first filed patent application did not provide support for these terms because the first filed patent application included only a passing reference to a “receiver”.  In particular, the only reference to the term “receiver” in the first filed patent application:

In this case, a typical scenario is that all the switches, for example light switches, upon actuation, emit one or a plurality of radio frequency telegrams which are received by a single receiver and the latter initiates the corresponding actions (lamp on/off, dimming of lamp, etc.).  (emphasis in original).

Even with only a passing reference to “receiver’, the Federal Circuit held that the claims were supported by the first filed parent application.  Even though the first filed patent application did not expressly describe the structure of the receiver and only included a passing reference, the specification must simply permit one of ordinary skill in the art to know and understand what structure corresponds to the means limitation so that he may perceive the bounds of the invention.  Based on the expert testimony, the court held that one of ordinary skill in the art could know and understand the “receiver” structure from the description given above.

In determining the priority date of any claim of a patent application or patent, the  patent application is read from the viewpoint of one of ordinary skill in the art.  If one of ordinary skill in the art would know and understand all of the limitations of the claims recited in the second filed patent application from reading the first filed patent application, then the priority date of those claims is the filing date of the first filed patent application, not the second filed patent application.

C.  Priority date resolved based on the “one of ordinary skill in the art” standard

The “one of ordinary skill in the art” standard can sometimes be  unpredictable in litigation because reasonable minds may differ.  Everyone, especially opposing parties, will have different opinions as to what “one of ordinary skill in the art” might understand from the specification of the patent.  However, it also gives flexibility such that the patent process is not overly burdensome with overly stringent and formalistic rules that one must always follow, or otherwise, risk invalidity of the patent.  For purposes of patent prosecution, the preference in many instances is to anticipate these issues and move away from the “ordinary skill” standard by including more information so that each limitation in the claims is clear as to what is being recited.

I invite you to contact me with your patent questions at (949) 433-0900 or [email protected] Please feel free to forward this article to your friends. As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Author

James Yang is a patent attorney. For more than 16 years, James Yang has been representing clients to secure patent protection for their inventions and register trademarks to protect their brands. If you need help, call him at (949) 433-0900. Read More…

Popular Posts

  • Patent process overview
  • Patent process explained
  • How much does a patent cost?
  • Why patent your invention in a bad economy?

Patent Book

Navigating the Patent System - new book by Orange County patent attorney, James Yang

Navigating the Patent System: Learn the patent process and strategies to protect your invention

Read for Free
Buy at Amazon

RECEIVE PATENT ARTICLES

Stay up to date on major changes and get tips on the patent process.

We respect your privacy.

Popular Posts

Patent process overview
Patent process explained
How much does a patent cost?
Trademark process and costs
Patent process and costs

 

Services

Utility Patents
Design Patents
Patent Prosecution Services
Patent Defense Services
Patent-Law Counsel for In-House Attorneys
Trademark Prosecution Services
See All Services

Industries

Automotive Patents
Consumer Products Patents
Culinary Patents
Manufacturing Patents
Medical Patents
Optics Patents
Software & App Patents
See All Industries

Contact

James Yang
OC Patent Lawyer
2372 Morse Ave., Suite #178
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 433-0900

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Sitemaps

Sitemap: Pages | Sitemap: Posts

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

By accessing this blog, you agree that no attorney-client relationship is formed except by a subsequent written retainer agreement. Also, you agree to not send confidential information unless directed by me to do so. The information posted on this blog is legal information and not legal advice.
Complete Terms of Use
Complete Privacy Policy

ADA Compliance

OC Patent Lawyer aims to ensure that its services are accessible to people with disabilities.
Accessibility Statement

Service Area

From our office in Irvine, California, we serve clients from all areas within Orange County and Los Angeles County, California.

© 2023 · James Yang, Your Entrepreneur and Mid-Size Business Patent Attorney