• Home
  • About Me
    • Client Reviews
    • Patent Samples
    • Accolades
    • About Firm
    • Technologies
    • FAQs
  • Services
    • Patent Prosecution Services
    • Patent Defense Services
    • Patent Enforcement Services
    • Trademark Search Services
    • Trademark Prosecution Services
    • Trademark Enforcement Services
    • Trademark Defense Services
    • Patent and Trademark Licensing Services
    • Worldwide Patent and Trademark Services
  • Learning Resources
    • Invention Agreements
      • What is an NDA and when to use them?
      • How to use a contract to protect your invention?
      • Working with others without losing your IP rights
      • Patent Assignments for Independent Contractors
      • Losing Invention Rights When Hiring or Collaborating with Others
      • Avoid Problems: Get an Invention Assignment Agreement
    • Protect Inventions
      • Do you need to get your patent attorney to sign an NDA?
      • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
      • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
      • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
      • Four types of intellectual property to protect your idea and how to use them
      • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
      • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
      • File a patent application before telling others about the invention
      • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
      • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
      • Best uses for design patents
      • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
      • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
      • Benefits of Patent Protection
      • Continuation patent application and related divisional and continuation in part
      • Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
    • How Patent Applications Work: the Basics
      • How to respond to an office action?
      • Request for non-publication of a patent application
      • Anatomy of a Patent Document
      • How to write a broad patent application?
      • Design patents: pros and cons
    • Patent process
      • Overview of the examination process within the USPTO
      • What is a patent search and How to do it?
      • Patent attorneys, agents and the USPTO can help with the patent process
      • Highs and lows of securing patent protection for your invention
      • Patent Process: Invention to Patent Granted (Comprehensive)
      • Benefits of a Patent Search
      • Overview of Patent Process
      • Patent process timeline and major milestones
      • Patent process, overall steps and procedures
      • What is the Patent Office procedure after filing a patent application?
      • USPTO Website
    • Patent costs
      • How much does it cost to get a utility patent?
      • Provisional Patent Application: Cheap Alternative?
      • Patent Cost Framework and cash flow
      • Provisional patent application: a cheap option?
      • Cheap provisional patent applications
    • Worldwide patents
      • Pros and cons of securing worldwide patent protection and their steps
      • Foreign patent filing to secure protection in other countries
    • Responding to Office Actions
      • Overview of Office Actions
    • Patent infringement
      • Basics of writing a patent claim for a patent application
      • What are the patent marking requirements and its benefits?
      • Avoiding Patent Infringement
      • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product?
      • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product? (Design Patent)
    • Trademarks
      • Trademark Registration: common law, state and federal
      • How to obtain a federal trademark registration?
      • How to select a trademark?
        • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Schedule Consultation
  • Contact

Patent Attorney | Orange County | OC Patent Lawyer

Orange County Patent Attorney

(949) 433-0900
You are here: Home / Trade secret / End run around inevitable disclosure doctrine

End run around inevitable disclosure doctrine

July 9, 2012 by James Yang

Scope of injunction narrow based on rejection of inevitable disclosure doctrine

In a trade secret case, courts tailor the scope of an injunction to narrowly protect the trade secret information of the trade secret owner.  Anything more may prevent others from being able to seek employment or engage in a lawful profession which goes against California’s strong public policy of encouraging employee mobility embodied in California Business & Professions Code Section 16600.  For example, the injunction would normally be directed to prohibition on the use of customer data and not to communication with the customer if the means by which communication is established is through public information (e.g., linkedin.com, directories, etc.).  Employers must also bear in mind that if an employee has learned trade secret information on-the-job, the Courts will not enjoin the employee from seeking employment even though disclosure of the trade secret information would be inevitable.  California has rejected the inevitable disclosure doctrine.

Background of litigation

In Pyro v. Souza (E.D. Cal. March 21, 2012), Mr. Souza was employed by Pyro from 1995 – January 2012. Pyro is the largest fireworks production company in the United States. Shortly before resigning and leaving Pyro, Souza downloaded over 60 Pyro files from his Pyro – assigned laptop to his personal external hard drive and two (2) additional USB drives. Mr. Sousa additionally used a wiping software – “Disk Redactor” – to delete and write over several computer files on the Pyro – assigned laptop. Mr. Sousa also hired a computer expert to help delete various files and folders from the Pyro – assigned laptop. Mr. Sousa also informed Pyro that he had not found alternative work when he resigned, when in fact he had already signed an employment contract with J & M displays – a competitor of Pyro.

Request for broad injunction

During litigation, Pyro sought injunctive relief prohibiting Mr. Souza from using customer lists and other trade secret information he had downloaded from Pyro. Moreover, Pyro also requested the Court to enjoin defendant from doing business with any Pyro customer he learned of through his employment at Pyro. This was in addition to the prohibition from utilizing the downloaded computer data (i.e., trade secret information) misappropriated by Mr. Souza.  Pyro was in essence asking the court to issue a nonsolicitation injunction based on client data Mr. Souza had memorized while employed with Pyro. Although the opinion did not specifically describe the request as being related to the inevitable disclosure doctrine which has been expressly rejected by California, Pyro’s enlarged request without tying it to trade secret data is in essence an attempt to base the injunction on the inevitable disclosure of Pyro’s trade secret information by Mr. Souza.

Court grants enlarged injunction based on pattern of bad acts by trade secret misappropriator

In this case, since Mr. Souza had a pattern of bad acts, the Court granted the enlarged injunction.  In particular, the Court enjoined Mr. Souza from directly or indirectly initiating contact with any current Pyro customer in Northern California and Hawaii with whom Mr. Souza and contact with while employed by Pyro. Accordingly, although California has expressly rejected the inevitable disclosure doctrine, the courts appear willing to broaden an injunction if given a reason to do so.

I invite you to contact me with your patent questions at (949) 433-0900 or [email protected]. Please feel free to forward this article to your friends. As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Filed Under: Trade secret

Author: James Yang

Helping entrepreneurs and mid-size businesses since 2004. Call me at (949) 433-0900 to schedule your free initial consultation. Read More…

Covid-19

Covid-19: We are fully operational.  Due to Covid-19, all meetings are conducted via zoom.

Professional Profile

James Yang Business Patent Attorney

James Yang, Patent Attorney

James Yang is a patent attorney whose practice encompasses all area of intellectual law including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets. Professional Profile

Popular Posts

  • Patent process overview
  • Patent process explained
  • How much does a patent cost?

New Book Release

Navigating the Patent System - new book by Orange County patent attorney, James Yang

Navigating the Patent System: Learn the patent process and strategies to protect your invention

Read for Free
Buy at Amazon

Peer Recognition

top attorney patent application
client choice patent application
Rated by Super Lawyers
AV Preeminent rating

RECEIVE PATENT UPDATES

Stay up to date on major changes and get tips on patent prosecution.

We respect your privacy.

Popular Posts

Patent process overview
Patent process explained
How much does a patent cost?
Trademark process and costs
Patent process and costs

 

Services

  • Patent Prosecution Services
    Patent Defense Services
    Trademark Prosecution Services
    See All Services

Contact

James Yang
OC Patent Lawyer
2372 Morse Ave., Suite #178
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 433-0900

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Sitemaps

Sitemap: Pages | Sitemap: Posts

Terms of Use

By accessing this blog, you agree that no attorney-client relationship is formed except by a subsequent written retainer agreement. Also, you agree to not send confidential information unless directed by me to do so. The information posted on this blog is legal information and not legal advice.
Complete terms of use

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT

© 2021 · James Yang, Your Entrepreneur and Mid-Size Business Patent Attorney