• Home
  • About Me
    • Client Reviews
    • Patent Samples
    • Accolades
    • About Firm
    • Technologies
    • FAQs
  • Services
    • Patent Prosecution Services
    • Patent Defense Services
    • Patent Enforcement Services
    • Trademark Search Services
    • Trademark Prosecution Services
    • Trademark Enforcement Services
    • Trademark Defense Services
    • Patent and Trademark Licensing Services
    • Worldwide Patent and Trademark Services
  • Learning Resources
    • Invention Agreements
      • What is an NDA and when to use them?
      • How to use a contract to protect your invention?
      • Working with others without losing your IP rights
      • Patent Assignments for Independent Contractors
      • Losing Invention Rights When Hiring or Collaborating with Others
      • Avoid Problems: Get an Invention Assignment Agreement
    • Protect Inventions
      • Do you need to get your patent attorney to sign an NDA?
      • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
      • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
      • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
      • Four types of intellectual property you can use to protect your idea and how to use them
      • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
      • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
      • File a patent application before telling others about the invention
      • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
      • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
      • Best uses for design patents
      • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
      • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
      • Benefits of Patent Protection
      • Continuation patent application and related divisional and continuation in part
      • Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
    • How Patent Applications Work: the Basics
      • How to respond to an office action?
      • Request for non-publication of a patent application
      • Anatomy of a Patent Document
      • How to write a broad patent application?
      • Design patents: pros and cons
    • Patent process
      • Overview of the examination process within the USPTO
      • What is a patent search and How to do it?
      • Patent attorneys, agents and the USPTO can help with the patent process
      • Highs and lows of securing patent protection for your invention
      • Patent Process: Invention to Patent Granted (Comprehensive)
      • Benefits of a Patent Search
      • Overview of Patent Process
      • Patent process timeline and major milestones
      • Patent process, overall steps and procedures
      • What is the Patent Office procedure after filing a patent application?
      • USPTO Website
    • Patent costs
      • How much does it cost to get a utility patent?
      • Provisional Patent Application: Cheap Alternative?
      • Patent Cost Framework and cash flow
      • Provisional patent application: a cheap option?
      • Cheap provisional patent applications
    • Worldwide patents
      • Pros and cons of securing worldwide patent protection and their steps
      • Foreign patent filing to secure protection in other countries
    • Responding to Office Actions
      • Overview of Office Actions
    • Patent infringement
      • Basics of writing a patent claim for a patent application
      • What are the patent marking requirements and its benefits?
      • Avoiding Patent Infringement
      • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product?
      • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product? (Design Patent)
    • Trademarks
      • Trademark Registration: common law, state and federal
      • How to obtain a federal trademark registration?
      • How to select a trademark?
        • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Schedule Consultation
  • Contact

Patent Attorney | Orange County | OC Patent Lawyer

Orange County Patent Attorney

(949) 433-0900
You are here: Home / Patent application process / Before filing a patent application / Inventions eligible for patent protection

Inventions eligible for patent protection

May 8, 2012 by James Yang

Mayo v. Prometheus is a seminal case which defines the ideas or invention eligible for patent protection.  For a few years now, the patent bar has been debating the scope of inventions that might be eligible for patent protection.  The Bilski case decided a few years ago pushed the realm of patent-eligible subject matter into a easy to understand test, namely, the machine or transformation test.  Although the machine or transformation test was described as merely a clue to eligibility, practitioners and the USPTO appear to have latched onto the machine or transformation test.  The thinking was that if the invention could pass the machine or transformation test, then the invention would be eligible for patent protection.

Under Mayo v. Prometheus, the U.S. Supreme Court reiterated that the machine or transformation test is merely a clue.  Eligibility of patent protection does not turn on the machine or transformation test.  Rather, the US Supreme Court provided the following analytical framework to determine whether a claimed invention is eligible for patent protection.  The preliminary assumption is that all inventions to a certain degree rely on one or more fundamental laws of nature.  However, the claim must not be too broad so as to preempt the use of a natural law of nature.  The claims must be examined so as determine whether those elements or combination of elements other than the fundamental law of nature contain an inventive concept.

In Mayo, the claim language which was determined to be ineligible for patent protection is instructive on applying this analytical framework.  In particular, the invention in Mayo was related to a drug which was metabolized differently by different people.  As a result, a single strength for the general population was effective for some but not everyone.  The invention contemplated utilizing a diagnostic test to determine how the particular patient metabolized the drug and altering the prescription based on the results of the diagnostic test.  The claims recited the specific ranges of the diagnostic test which indicated when the prescription should be increased or decreased.  It appears that the Court recognized the specific ranges as being a natural law of nature, or in other words, a description of how the body metabolized a particular drug.

In the prior art, all aspects of the claimed method were known except for the specific ranges.  In analyzing whether the claimed invention was eligible for patent protection, the Supreme Court compared the prior art to the claimed invention without regard the particular ranges and held that no inventive concept was being claimed.  All steps in the claimed method were well known in the prior art.  Hence, the invention was not eligible for patent protection.

The opinion also instructed against including as patent eligible an invention merely because the claimed invention is limited to a particular technological environment or included an insignificant post solution activity.

In response to the Mayo decision, it is important that one have a clear definition of the invention and provide a layered approach to drafting a patent application.  A broad claim should still be included and that might be rejected as being ineligible for patent protection.  However, other claims specifically focusing on the steps and not the basic law of nature should be included.  Patent applications should still be drafted as broad as possible but it should be layered until the specific embodiment disclosed by the inventor is disclosed in the patent application.  This is especially true for method claims and those claims which appear to be directed to a known causal relationship, rule of thumb or other mere discovery.

I invite you to contact me with your patent questions at (949) 433-0900 or [email protected]. Please feel free to forward this article to your friends. As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Filed Under: Before filing a patent application, Patent application process, Patent Eligible Subject Matter

Author: James Yang

Helping entrepreneurs and mid-size businesses since 2004. Call me at (949) 433-0900 to schedule your free initial consultation. Read More…

Professional Profile

James Yang Business Patent Attorney

James Yang, Patent Attorney

James Yang is a patent attorney whose practice encompasses all area of intellectual law including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets. Professional Profile

Popular Posts

  • Patent process overview
  • Patent process explained
  • How much does a patent cost?

New Book Release

Navigating the Patent System - new book by Orange County patent attorney, James Yang

Navigating the Patent System: Learn the patent process and strategies to protect your invention

Read for Free
Buy at Amazon

Peer Recognition

top attorney patent application
client choice patent application
Rated by Super Lawyers
AV Preeminent rating

RECEIVE PATENT UPDATES

Stay up to date on major changes and get tips on patent prosecution.

We respect your privacy.

Popular Posts

    Patent process overview
    Patent process explained
    How much does a patent cost?

Services

  • Patent Prosecution Services
    Patent Defense Services
    Trademark Prosecution Services
    See All Services

Contact

James Yang
OC Patent Lawyer
2372 Morse Ave., Suite #178
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 433-0900

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Sitemaps

Sitemap: Pages | Sitemap: Posts

Terms of Use

By accessing this blog, you agree that no attorney-client relationship is formed except by a subsequent written retainer agreement. Also, you agree to not send confidential information unless directed by me to do so. The information posted on this blog is legal information and not legal advice.
Complete terms of use

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT

© 2019 · James Yang, Your Entrepreneur and Mid-Size Business Patent Attorney