• Home
  • About
    • Client Reviews
    • Patent Samples
    • Accolades
    • About Firm
    • Technologies
    • FAQs
  • Services
    • Patents
      • Patent Consultation
      • Patent Search Service
      • Patent Application Service
      • Patent Prosecution
      • Utility Patents
      • Design Patents
      • Patent Defense
      • Patent Enforcement
      • Working with In-House Attorneys
    • Trademarks
      • Trademark Search
      • Trademark Application Services
      • Trademark Prosecution
      • Trademark Enforcement
      • Trademark Defense
    • Licensing
    • Worldwide IP
    • Risk Management
    • Due Diligence
  • Industries
    • Browse Patent Samples
    • Automotive Patents
    • Construction Patents
    • Consumer Products Patents
    • Electronics Patents
    • Food, Beverage, & Other Culinary Patents
    • Manufacturing Patents
    • Medical Products & Devices Patents
    • Optics Patents
    • Software & App Patents
    • Tools & Equipment Patents
  • Learning Resources
    • First-Time Inventor?
    • Why Patent Your Invention in a Bad Economy?
    • Videos on Patents
    • Search 180+ Articles
      • Patent process
        • Overview of Patent Process
          • Patent process timeline and major milestones
          • Patent Process: Invention to Patent Granted (Simplified)
          • Patent process, overall steps and procedures
        • Overview of the examination process within the USPTO
          • Highs and lows of securing patent protection for your invention
          • What is the Patent Office procedure after filing a patent application?
        • Benefits of a Patent Search
          • What is a patent search and How to do it?
        • Patent attorneys, agents and the USPTO can help with the patent process
        • USPTO Website
      • Invention Agreements
        • What is an NDA and when to use them?
        • How to use a contract to protect your invention?
        • Working with others without losing your IP rights
        • Patent Assignments for Independent Contractors
        • Losing Invention Rights When Hiring or Collaborating with Others
        • Avoid Problems: Get an Invention Assignment Agreement
      • Protect Inventions
        • Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
        • Do you need to get your patent attorney to sign an NDA?
        • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
        • Four types of intellectual property to protect your idea and how to use them
          • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
          • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
          • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
          • Benefits of Patent Protection
          • Best uses for design patents
        • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
          • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
          • File a patent application before telling others about the invention
        • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
          • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
        • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
          • What is a continuation patent application?
      • How Patent Applications Work: the Basics
        • How to respond to an office action?
        • Request for non-publication of a patent application
        • Anatomy of a Patent Document
        • How to write a broad patent application?
        • Design patents: pros and cons
      • Patent costs
        • How much does it cost to get a utility patent?
        • Provisional Patent Application: Cheap Alternative?
        • Patent Cost Framework and cash flow
        • Provisional patent application: a cheap option?
        • Cheap provisional patent applications
      • Patent infringement
        • Basics of writing a patent claim for a patent application
        • Patent Marking: Everything you wanted to know
        • Avoiding Patent Infringement
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product?
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product? (Design Patent)
      • Worldwide patents
        • Pros and cons of securing worldwide patent protection and their steps
        • Foreign patent filing to secure protection in other countries
      • Responding to Office Actions
        • Overview of Office Actions
      • Trademarks
        • Trademark Registration: common law, state and federal
        • How to obtain a federal trademark registration?
        • How to select a trademark?
          • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Schedule Consultation
  • Contact

Top-Rated Orange County Patent Lawyer | Helping Inventors in Orange County, Los Angeles County & Beyond | OC Patent Lawyer, Irvine CA

Orange County Patent Attorney

(949) 433-0900
You are here: Home / Patent Infringements / Irreparable harm easier to prove for grant of patent based injunction

Irreparable harm easier to prove for grant of patent based injunction

March 15, 2017 by James Yang

Irreparable HarmOne of the difficulties of securing a patent based injunction was that it was difficult to prove that the harm to the patent owner was irreparable or that monetary compensation was not enough to make the patent owner whole due to the infringement of the patent.  In Metalcraft v. Toro Co. (Fed. Cir. 2017), the Federal Circuit provided a basis for establishing irreparable harm that could be applicable to a wide range of situations so that proving irreparable harm would be much easier for many patent owners.

I.  Standard for grant of preliminary injunction

For a court to award an injunction, the court must analyze the situation to determine whether an injunction should be granted.  To do this, the court reviews four different factors.  The Metalcraft decision dealt with a preliminary injunction so we will briefly review the standard for granting a preliminary injunction which requires a party to establish:

  1. That it is likely to succeed on the merits;
  2. That it is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief;
  3. That the balance of equities tips in its favor; and
  4. That an injunction is in the public interest.

Winter v. NRDC, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008).

II.  Irreparable harm factor

The irreparable harm factor is the second of the four factors a court must take into consideration in determining whether to grant or deny a preliminary injunction.  For the patent owner, it poses its own challenges in showing that the infringement cause irreparable harm to the patent owner.

In Metalcraft, the Federal Circuit found that “where the injury cannot be quantified, no amount of money damages is calculable, and therefore the harm cannot be adequately compensated and is irreparable.” Accordingly, by showing that the monetary compensation cannot be calculated, irreparable harm can be established. In my opinion, this greatly enhances the patent owner’s ability to showing irreparable injury, and thus the ability of the patent owner to be granted an injunction. Some history may be useful in understanding the context of this case.

III.  Brief history of patent based injunction

In 2006, the Supreme Court decided eBay v. MercExchange (2006) and held that the standard for determining whether to grant or deny an injunction for patent case shall be like any other case and would not be granted automatically. Patent based injunctions used to be regularly granted pre-eBay as long as infringement was shown.  Post-eBay, the court had to take into consideration four different factors to analyze the situation to grant the injunction.

One of those factors was irreparable harm. Since patent infringement involved the sale of products wherein an infringing product was sold and profits went to the accused infringer instead of the patent owner, the courts generally found that it was easy to calculate monetary damages based on the infringement. The profits of the accused infringer or the lost profits of the patent owner were easy enough to calculate and awarded to the patent owner.

Patent owners complained that by denying the patent owner the right to enjoin others from making, using, selling, offering for sale the patented invention or importing the patented invention into the United States, the court was really denying patent owners the rights that they really sought when they filed the patent application – the right to exclude others.

Since 2006, the courts have begun to find ways that the patent owner can show irreparable harm. For example, in Apple v. Samsung, 809 F.3d 633, 641, 645 (Fed. Cir. 2015) the court recognized that it was difficult to quantify the harm to Apple’s “ecosystem” where one company’s customers would continue to buy that company’s products and recommend them to others.  The loss to the patent owner was characterized as difficult to calculate because of the variable and uncertain nature of the ecosystem.

IV.  Harm to brand loyalty constitutes irreparable harm

Here, the Federal Circuit indicated that the harm to brand loyalty of the patented product could be irreparable.  The harm to brand loyalty would result in the loss of a potentially lifelong customer and its damage was impossible to quantify, thus the harm was irreparable. This logic may be applicable to many patent owners that sell its patented products.

In my opinion, the Federal Circuit lowered the requirements to establish irreparable harm, and thus gave more power to patent owners.  The right to exclude others from competing against the patent owner is very powerful because it could be used to shut down a business or product line. The patent owner is not merely demanding an award of monetary compensation from the accused infringer. The injunction prohibits the competitor from competing and prevents the accused infringer from acquiring or establishing its own brand loyalty during infringement.

For the startup or inventor that relies upon a single patented product or small subset of patented products to sustain its business, the ability of the startup or inventor to prevent competition may be crucial to the inventor’s business survival.

I invite you to contact me with your patent questions at (949) 433-0900.  Please feel free to forward this article to your friends. As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities.

 

Related Articles for Patent Infringement

  • Basics of writing a patent claim for a patent application
  • Avoiding Patent Infringement
  • Can I copy my competitor’s product?
  • Can I copy my competitor’s Product? (Design Patent)
  • Attacking patent claims as indefinite made easier
  • Reducing Scope of Doctrine of Equivalents Via Ensnarement Defense
  • Broken chain of priority invalidates patent
  • Combine Claim Elements to Avoid Infringement
  • How to invalidate a patent based on a restriction requirement
  • Active inducement of infringement in physician patient relationships
  • Irreparable harm easier to prove for grant of patent based injunction
  • Everyone in the supply chain could be sued for patent infringement
  • Penalty for False Patent Marking
  • CAFC defines competitive injury for false patent marking
  • Process patent blocks importation of product
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Author

James Yang is a patent attorney. For more than 16 years, James Yang has been representing clients to secure patent protection for their inventions and register trademarks to protect their brands. If you need help, call him at (949) 433-0900. Read More…

Popular Posts

  • Patent process overview
  • Patent process explained
  • How much does a patent cost?
  • Why patent your invention in a bad economy?

Patent Book

Navigating the Patent System - new book by Orange County patent attorney, James Yang

Navigating the Patent System: Learn the patent process and strategies to protect your invention

Read for Free
Buy at Amazon

RECEIVE PATENT ARTICLES

Stay up to date on major changes and get tips on the patent process.

We respect your privacy.

Popular Posts

Patent process overview
Patent process explained
How much does a patent cost?
Trademark process and costs
Patent process and costs

 

Services

Patent Consultations
Patent Searches
Patent Applications
Utility Patents
Design Patents
Patent Prosecution Services
Patent Defense Services
Patent-Law Counsel for In-House Attorneys
Trademark Overview
Trademark Search Services
Trademark Application Services
Trademark Prosecution Services
Trademark Enforcement Services
Trademark Defense Services
See All Services

Industries

Automotive Patents
Consumer Products Patents
Culinary Patents
Manufacturing Patents
Medical Patents
Optics Patents
Software & App Patents
See All Industries

Contact

James Yang
OC Patent Lawyer
2372 Morse Ave., Suite #178
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 433-0900

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Sitemaps

Sitemap: Pages | Sitemap: Posts

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

By accessing this blog, you agree that no attorney-client relationship is formed except by a subsequent written retainer agreement. Also, you agree to not send confidential information unless directed by me to do so. The information posted on this blog is legal information and not legal advice.
Complete Terms of Use
Complete Privacy Policy

ADA Compliance

OC Patent Lawyer aims to ensure that its services are accessible to people with disabilities.
Accessibility Statement

Service Area

From our office in Irvine, California, we serve clients from all areas within Orange County and Los Angeles County, California.

© 2023 · James Yang, Your Entrepreneur and Mid-Size Business Patent Attorney