• Home
  • About
    • Client Reviews
    • Patent Samples
    • Accolades
    • About Firm
    • Technologies
    • FAQs
  • Services
    • Patent
      • Utility Patents
      • Design Patents
      • Patent Application
      • Patent Defense
      • Patent Enforcement
      • Working with In-House Attorneys
    • Trademark
      • Trademark Search
      • Trademark Application
      • Trademark Enforcement
      • Trademark Defense
    • Licensing
    • Worldwide IP
    • Risk Management
    • Due Diligence
  • Industries
    • Browse Patent Samples
    • Automotive Patents
    • Construction Patents
    • Consumer Products Patents
    • Electronics Patents
    • Food, Beverage, & Other Culinary Patents
    • Manufacturing Patents
    • Medical Products & Devices Patents
    • Optics Patents
    • Software & App Patents
    • Tools & Equipment Patents
  • Learning Resources
    • First-Time Inventor?
    • Why Patent Your Invention in a Bad Economy?
    • Videos on Patents
    • Search 180+ Articles
      • Patent process
        • Overview of Patent Process
          • Patent process timeline and major milestones
          • Patent Process: Invention to Patent Granted (Simplified)
          • Patent process, overall steps and procedures
        • Overview of the examination process within the USPTO
          • Highs and lows of securing patent protection for your invention
          • What is the Patent Office procedure after filing a patent application?
        • Benefits of a Patent Search
          • What is a patent search and How to do it?
        • Patent attorneys, agents and the USPTO can help with the patent process
        • USPTO Website
      • Invention Agreements
        • What is an NDA and when to use them?
        • How to use a contract to protect your invention?
        • Working with others without losing your IP rights
        • Patent Assignments for Independent Contractors
        • Losing Invention Rights When Hiring or Collaborating with Others
        • Avoid Problems: Get an Invention Assignment Agreement
      • Protect Inventions
        • Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
        • Do you need to get your patent attorney to sign an NDA?
        • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
        • Four types of intellectual property to protect your idea and how to use them
          • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
          • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
          • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
          • Benefits of Patent Protection
          • Best uses for design patents
        • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
          • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
          • File a patent application before telling others about the invention
        • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
          • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
        • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
          • What is a continuation patent application?
      • How Patent Applications Work: the Basics
        • How to respond to an office action?
        • Request for non-publication of a patent application
        • Anatomy of a Patent Document
        • How to write a broad patent application?
        • Design patents: pros and cons
      • Patent costs
        • How much does it cost to get a utility patent?
        • Provisional Patent Application: Cheap Alternative?
        • Patent Cost Framework and cash flow
        • Provisional patent application: a cheap option?
        • Cheap provisional patent applications
      • Patent infringement
        • Basics of writing a patent claim for a patent application
        • Patent Marking: Everything you wanted to know
        • Avoiding Patent Infringement
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product?
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product? (Design Patent)
      • Worldwide patents
        • Pros and cons of securing worldwide patent protection and their steps
        • Foreign patent filing to secure protection in other countries
      • Responding to Office Actions
        • Overview of Office Actions
      • Trademarks
        • Trademark Registration: common law, state and federal
        • How to obtain a federal trademark registration?
        • How to select a trademark?
          • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Schedule Consultation
  • Contact

Top-Rated Orange County Patent Lawyer | Helping Inventors in Orange County, Los Angeles County & Beyond | OC Patent Lawyer, Irvine CA

Orange County Patent Attorney

(949) 433-0900
You are here: Home / Lessons / Core Concept 2: Ownership–Resolving Ownership Issues (Chapter 2)

Core Concept 2: Ownership–Resolving Ownership Issues (Chapter 2)

April 11, 2018 by James Yang

Back to: Navigating the Patent System

The big problem here is that ownership of the rights to the invention may arise and vest with multiple people because of the way that the invention was created. However, to fully exploit the inventive technology, those that contributed to the invention should assign the invention rights to a single entity, such as a person or a corporation. Otherwise, the co-inventors can destroy the value of the invention and harm the other owner(s).

Ownership is one of the concepts that should be clarified and investigated prior to the filing of a patent application. The reason is that if a single inventor does not entirely own the invention rights he or she cannot effectively seek patent protection for the idea. When there are multiple inventors, inventive rights vest (i.e., belong) to the inventors who conceive of the invention. Invention rights split between multiple inventors (i.e., not controlled by any one entity) arise from relationships such as co-inventorship, investor–inventor relationships, independent contractors, and employer–employee relationships and may cause the inventors from exploiting the technology for fear of what the other co-owners might do to harm the others if there is a disagreement. To avoid these problems, these inventive rights should be transferred to a single entity by “assignment,” as explained below.

Co-inventorship

“Co-inventorship” is the situation where two or more people collectively come up with an idea to solve a problem. This group of people is known as the “inventive entity.” At the beginning, each inventor included in the inventive entity owns one hundred percent of the invention. Each of the co-inventors may think that he or she does not want to harm the other inventor(s), but over time feelings may change. Business pressures and personal problems may impose new duties and obligations on the co- inventors. Fights and disagreements may cause co-inventors to have very different views on how to commercialize the patent(s) or market products under the patent. Another downside to co-inventorship is that under United States law, each inventor can market and sell the patented invention without accounting for, or sharing, his or her profits with the other inventor(s). Additionally, any of the inventors can act against the interest of any other co-inventor by dedicating the invention to the public (i.e., allowing it to be designated part of the public domain) without permission from a co-inventor.

To mitigate potential disagreements, the co-inventors may enter into a “joint exploitation agreement.” In this agreement, the co-inventors mutually agree that they will not dedicate the invention to the public. They also agree that they will not market or sell the invention separately. Another more common means of protecting co-inventors is to form a corporate entity (e.g., L.L.C., S–Corporation, etc.) and assign the invention rights to the corporation. In this case, the co-inventors will split the shares of the corporation and, through the corporate structure, determine the rights and responsibilities of each of the co-inventors. This may deter inventors from harming the patented invention owned by the business due to their duty of loyalty to the corporation.

Inventor-investor relationships

Ownership conflicts may also arise in inventor–investor relationships. An inventor may contribute the invention rights to the business while the investor contributes monetary funds. In other words, the inventor puts forth sweat equity and the rights to the invention, whereas the investor puts forth monetary equity. However, the inventor owns the inventive rights unless he or she assigns them to another person.

To protect both parties, the inventor should not assign any percentage (i.e., less than 100%) of the invention rights to an investor even if the investor is asking for this. Doing so would not be optimal for the inventor or the investor. If there is a disagreement between the investor and inventor, they can each harm the invention’s value by dedicating the inventive rights to the public or licensing the rights to a competitor without accounting for profits to the other co-inventor.

An assignment of 100% of the rights to the investor can hurt the inventor, as well.  The investor can now sell or license the rights to the invention to a third party without compensation to the inventor or start a new company without the inventor. This is not a good situation for the inventor. In this case, the inventor now has no ownership rights or interest in the patent rights and the investor can harm the inventor.

To avoid these types of situations, the inventor should assign the invention rights to a corporation. At the corporate level, the shares, money, and/or employment opportunities can be divided as desired, and the rights and responsibilities of the all parties decided. Their duty of loyalty to the corporation prevents both parties from doing things that might devalue the invention.

Independent contractors

Ownership issues could also arise in a relationship between an inventor and an independent contractor (e.g., consultant, engineer, designer). As established, the inventive rights vest with the person that conceives of the invention, unless an assignment occurs. An independent contractor who conceives of an invention, even a small part, owns his or her part of the invention. If that part of the invention is incorporated into the inventor’s patent application, and the application later matures into a patent, the independent contractor owns the entire patent along with any other inventor. To avoid this, the inventor should request that the independent contractor sign an “invention assignment agreement.” In this agreement, the independent contractor “agrees to assign and does hereby assign” the inventive rights to the company when the independent contractor conceives of an invention. This is a common requirement in independent contractor agreements and many independent contractors do not take issue with signing an invention assignment agreement. That is, of course, unless the assignment is so broad that the independent contractor would be precluded from seeking employment from other companies. The agreement should be reasonable in scope and seek only to assign inventive rights (solely applicable to the job they were hired for) to the hiring company.

If the independent contractor is unwilling to execute an assignment agreement, then a suitable solution may be an agreement that you would have a license to any technology the independent contractor incorporated into your product. The purpose of this fall-back position is to allow you to go to any other independent contractor and not be locked into a particular independent contractor.

Employer-employee relationships

Conflicts may also occur in employer–employee relationships. Many companies at their inception are small and funds are tight. These companies may not have formal employer–employee agreements wherein the employee agrees to assign all invention rights to the company. As companies grow, they may rely on goodwill and tight-knit relationships between employers and the employees. However, this goodwill is not enforceable in a court of law. Employers should therefore enter into an invention assignment agreement with employees. Without it, the employee may retain his or her invention and the invention rights would not belong to the employer. These assignment agreements are desirable for project developers, sales personnel who come up with ways to improve the company’s product, and/or employees involved in manufacturing who might have insight into the most efficient way of making products.

Previous Lesson
Core Concept 1: Defining the Invention (Chapter 1)
Next Lesson
Core Concept 3: Conducting a Novelty Search (Chapter 3)

Table of Contents

  • Introduction
    • Disclaimer
    • What you will find in this course
    • How to use this course
  • To Patent or Not To Patent (Section 1)
    • Purpose of the patent system
    • Benefits to the patent owner
    • Overview of the Seven Core Concepts
  • Getting Started: Seven Core Patent Concepts
    • Core Concept 1: Defining the Invention (Chapter 1)
    • Core Concept 2: Ownership–Resolving Ownership Issues (Chapter 2)
    • Core Concept 3: Conducting a Novelty Search (Chapter 3)
    • Core Concept 4: Different Ways to Protect an Idea (Chapter 4)
    • Core Concept 5: Three Bars to Patentability and the First-Inventor-to-File Regime (Chapter 5)
    • Core Concept 6: Preserving Foreign Patent Protection (Chapter 6)
    • Core Concept 7: The Overall Patent Process and Costs (Chapter 7)
  • Utility and Design Patent Applications (Section 2)
    • How to use this section on patent applications
    • Deciding what application to file: Design or utility?
    • Design Applications (Chapter 8)
    • Cost Considerations for Provisional and Nonprovisional Utility Patent Applications (Chapter 9)
    • Overarching Principles of a Utility Patent Application (Chapter 10)
    • Parts of a Utility Patent Application (Chapter 11)
    • Claims section
    • Writing Tip #1: How to write an application with the broadest possible protection (without breaking the bank) (Chapter 12)
    • Writing Tip #2: Be explicit. Don’t rely on inferences made in the patent application
    • Writing Tip #3: Using the word “may” versus “is”
    • Writing Tip #4: Preferred embodiments and using the word “substantial”
    • Writing Tip #5: Do not use the word, “invention” 
    • Writing Tip #6: Suboptimal embodiments
    • Writing Tip #7: Ranges
    • Writing Tip #8: Software Inventions
  • Patent Examination FAQs (Section 3)
    • FAQ #1: Patent Process Timing
    • FAQs #2-3: Patent Costs
    • FAQ #4: Duty to search v. Duty to disclose
    • FAQ #5: Review of Formalities
    • FAQs #6-7: Secrecy
    • FAQs #8-9: Nonpublication request and foreign patent protection
    • FAQs #10-16: Restriction Requirement
    • FAQs #17-21: Responding to Office Action rejections
    • FAQs #22-29: Broadening patent protection
  • Appendices
    • Appendix A: Trademark
    • Appendix B: Sample Utility Patent  
    • Appendix C: Sample Design Patent
    • Appendix D: Sample Trademark Registration
    • Appendix E: Entity Size 
    • Appendix F: Patent Laws

Popular Posts

Patent process overview
Patent process explained
How much does a patent cost?
Trademark process and costs
Patent process and costs

 

Services

Utility Patents
Design Patents
Patent Prosecution Services
Patent Defense Services
Patent-Law Counsel for In-House Attorneys
Trademark Prosecution Services
See All Services

Industries

Automotive Patents
Consumer Products Patents
Culinary Patents
Manufacturing Patents
Medical Patents
Optics Patents
Software & App Patents
See All Industries

Contact

James Yang
OC Patent Lawyer
2372 Morse Ave., Suite #178
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 433-0900

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Sitemaps

Sitemap: Pages | Sitemap: Posts

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

By accessing this blog, you agree that no attorney-client relationship is formed except by a subsequent written retainer agreement. Also, you agree to not send confidential information unless directed by me to do so. The information posted on this blog is legal information and not legal advice.
Complete Terms of Use
Complete Privacy Policy

ADA Compliance

OC Patent Lawyer aims to ensure that its services are accessible to people with disabilities.
Accessibility Statement

Service Area

From our office in Irvine, California, we serve clients from all areas within Orange County and Los Angeles County, California.

© 2023 · James Yang, Your Entrepreneur and Mid-Size Business Patent Attorney