• Home
  • About
    • Client Reviews
    • Patent Samples
    • Accolades
    • About Firm
    • Technologies
    • FAQs
  • Services
    • Patent
      • Utility Patents
      • Design Patents
      • Patent Application
      • Patent Defense
      • Patent Enforcement
      • Working with In-House Attorneys
    • Trademark
      • Trademark Search
      • Trademark Application
      • Trademark Enforcement
      • Trademark Defense
    • Licensing
    • Worldwide IP
    • Risk Management
    • Due Diligence
  • Industries
    • Browse Patent Samples
    • Automotive Patents
    • Construction Patents
    • Consumer Products Patents
    • Electronics Patents
    • Food, Beverage, & Other Culinary Patents
    • Manufacturing Patents
    • Medical Products & Devices Patents
    • Optics Patents
    • Software & App Patents
    • Tools & Equipment Patents
  • Learning Resources
    • First-Time Inventor?
    • Why Patent Your Invention in a Bad Economy?
    • Videos on Patents
    • Search 180+ Articles
      • Patent process
        • Overview of Patent Process
          • Patent process timeline and major milestones
          • Patent Process: Invention to Patent Granted (Simplified)
          • Patent process, overall steps and procedures
        • Overview of the examination process within the USPTO
          • Highs and lows of securing patent protection for your invention
          • What is the Patent Office procedure after filing a patent application?
        • Benefits of a Patent Search
          • What is a patent search and How to do it?
        • Patent attorneys, agents and the USPTO can help with the patent process
        • USPTO Website
      • Invention Agreements
        • What is an NDA and when to use them?
        • How to use a contract to protect your invention?
        • Working with others without losing your IP rights
        • Patent Assignments for Independent Contractors
        • Losing Invention Rights When Hiring or Collaborating with Others
        • Avoid Problems: Get an Invention Assignment Agreement
      • Protect Inventions
        • Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
        • Do you need to get your patent attorney to sign an NDA?
        • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
        • Four types of intellectual property to protect your idea and how to use them
          • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
          • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
          • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
          • Benefits of Patent Protection
          • Best uses for design patents
        • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
          • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
          • File a patent application before telling others about the invention
        • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
          • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
        • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
          • What is a continuation patent application?
      • How Patent Applications Work: the Basics
        • How to respond to an office action?
        • Request for non-publication of a patent application
        • Anatomy of a Patent Document
        • How to write a broad patent application?
        • Design patents: pros and cons
      • Patent costs
        • How much does it cost to get a utility patent?
        • Provisional Patent Application: Cheap Alternative?
        • Patent Cost Framework and cash flow
        • Provisional patent application: a cheap option?
        • Cheap provisional patent applications
      • Patent infringement
        • Basics of writing a patent claim for a patent application
        • Patent Marking: Everything you wanted to know
        • Avoiding Patent Infringement
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product?
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product? (Design Patent)
      • Worldwide patents
        • Pros and cons of securing worldwide patent protection and their steps
        • Foreign patent filing to secure protection in other countries
      • Responding to Office Actions
        • Overview of Office Actions
      • Trademarks
        • Trademark Registration: common law, state and federal
        • How to obtain a federal trademark registration?
        • How to select a trademark?
          • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Schedule Consultation
  • Contact

Top-Rated Orange County Patent Lawyer | Helping Inventors in Orange County, Los Angeles County & Beyond | OC Patent Lawyer, Irvine CA

Orange County Patent Attorney

(949) 433-0900
You are here: Home / Lessons / Writing Tip #6: Suboptimal embodiments

Writing Tip #6: Suboptimal embodiments

April 11, 2018 by James Yang

Back to: Navigating the Patent System

It may be beneficial to include suboptimal embodiments (i.e., versions of the invention that are not what the inventor understands to be its best mode) in the patent application along with alternative embodiments of the invention that are not central to the inventor’s vision, at least to the extent that they relate to the point of novelty. If the mechanical pencil’s point of novelty is the mechanism that pushes the lead forward through the pencil (i.e., the mechanical clicker), the mechanical clicker’s optimal positioning, and best mode, may be near the user’s index finger. However, indicating that the mechanical clicker can be positioned at different, less convenient areas (e.g., upper part near the eraser) of the pencil body may also be beneficial. Less optimal embodiments may not be as advantageous those of the best mode of the mechanical pencil, but can nevertheless be considered a minimally viable product that could compete with the invention. Hence, the minimally viable product or embodiment should be included in the patent application with the claims directed to the shared point of novelty to secure proper patent protection (in this case, a mechanical clicker positioned on the body of the mechanical pencil regardless of its position). Including these alternative embodiments also provides a buffer zone around the preferred embodiments of the invention by preventing others from obtaining a patent on these alternative embodiments. For example, including multiple, though less convenient, positions of the mechanical clicker system in the patent application would prevent others from patenting a mechanical pencil that is only slightly different such as a mechanical pencil with a clicker system on a different position away from the index finger on the pencil body.

As a case in point for including suboptimal embodiments, Kennametal (patent owner) sued Ingersoll (accused infringer) for patent infringement on its patented cutting tool containing ruthenium as a binder, which was coated onto the tool using a physical vapor deposition (PVD) process.46 Ingersoll attacked the patent’s validity, citing a prior  art reference in a another company’s (Grab) patent in which the application of the ruthenium coating by way of physical vapor disposition was not the primary way of applying the coating. However, it had been included as a passing comment and appears to have been an afterthought during the preparation of the patent application.47 The court ruled Kennametal’s patent invalid and that the teaching or disclosure found in the Grab prior art reference prevented other companies from securing a patent for the process of applying ruthenium as a binder via PVD.

Based on Kennametal, use of the phrase, “other ways or means or components are also contemplated including but not limited to [insert list of alternatives],” may be used to broaden the scope of patent protection. This case also demonstrates the advantages of including alternative embodiments to prevent others from securing a patent on similar, yet distinct (and perhaps less effective), methods. At the time of filing, the inventor may consider them less favorable, but one may later become the preferred embodiment, or at least a competitive alternative.

By including these alternative embodiments in the application, prior art is created that can be used against the patents and patent applications of competitors. Moreover, by including them in the specification, the inventor is able to later claim these alternative embodiments for him or herself.

Footnotes:

46. Kennametal, Inc. v. Ingersoll Cutting Tool Co., 780 F.3d 1376, (Fed. Cir. March 25, 2015)

47. Ingersoll (Defendant) petitioned the USPTO to reexamine Kennametal’s patent in light of the Grab prior art patent reference, which expressly disclosed all of the limitations of Kennametal’s claimed invention except for the method of applying the ruthenium binder via PVD process. The prior art reference mentioned ruthenium being applied with the PVD method but only as a side note (“However, applicants also contemplate that one or more layers of a coating scheme may be applied by physical vapor deposition (PVD).”) Kennametal argued that Grab did not disclose the PVD method. The examples in the Grab reference only focused on two other unrelated, preferred methods of ruthenium application, mentioning PVD only as a “contemplated” method. Kennametal argued that, according to the Grab reference, one could not “immediately envisage” ruthenium being applied by PVD and it could not therefore be characterized as disclosing such information in order to invalidate Kennametal’s patent. The Grab reference disclosed many different base materials and combinations thereof as well as three different methods of applying those materials. According to Kennametal, a total of 10,881 different combinations of binder materials and processes for applying them existed within the disclosure of the Grab reference. Kennametal asserted that the large number of possibilities negated the disclosure of any one specific combination except those “immediately envisaged” according to the description of the Grab reference. The specific examples highlighted in the specification are immediately envisaged and disclosed in the specification. But what about the other combinations? The Federal Circuit reasoned that since Claim 5 of the Grab reference recited five different materials (including ruthenium), and the patent disclosed only three different coating methods (including PVD), the Grab patent disclosed only fifteen, not 10,881 combinations. Grab’s explicit “contemplation” of PVD was sufficient evidence that a reader would immediately envisage applying ruthenium as a binder using PVD

Previous Lesson
Writing Tip #5: Do not use the word, “invention” 
Next Lesson
Writing Tip #7: Ranges

Table of Contents

  • Introduction
    • Disclaimer
    • What you will find in this course
    • How to use this course
  • To Patent or Not To Patent (Section 1)
    • Purpose of the patent system
    • Benefits to the patent owner
    • Overview of the Seven Core Concepts
  • Getting Started: Seven Core Patent Concepts
    • Core Concept 1: Defining the Invention (Chapter 1)
    • Core Concept 2: Ownership–Resolving Ownership Issues (Chapter 2)
    • Core Concept 3: Conducting a Novelty Search (Chapter 3)
    • Core Concept 4: Different Ways to Protect an Idea (Chapter 4)
    • Core Concept 5: Three Bars to Patentability and the First-Inventor-to-File Regime (Chapter 5)
    • Core Concept 6: Preserving Foreign Patent Protection (Chapter 6)
    • Core Concept 7: The Overall Patent Process and Costs (Chapter 7)
  • Utility and Design Patent Applications (Section 2)
    • How to use this section on patent applications
    • Deciding what application to file: Design or utility?
    • Design Applications (Chapter 8)
    • Cost Considerations for Provisional and Nonprovisional Utility Patent Applications (Chapter 9)
    • Overarching Principles of a Utility Patent Application (Chapter 10)
    • Parts of a Utility Patent Application (Chapter 11)
    • Claims section
    • Writing Tip #1: How to write an application with the broadest possible protection (without breaking the bank) (Chapter 12)
    • Writing Tip #2: Be explicit. Don’t rely on inferences made in the patent application
    • Writing Tip #3: Using the word “may” versus “is”
    • Writing Tip #4: Preferred embodiments and using the word “substantial”
    • Writing Tip #5: Do not use the word, “invention” 
    • Writing Tip #6: Suboptimal embodiments
    • Writing Tip #7: Ranges
    • Writing Tip #8: Software Inventions
  • Patent Examination FAQs (Section 3)
    • FAQ #1: Patent Process Timing
    • FAQs #2-3: Patent Costs
    • FAQ #4: Duty to search v. Duty to disclose
    • FAQ #5: Review of Formalities
    • FAQs #6-7: Secrecy
    • FAQs #8-9: Nonpublication request and foreign patent protection
    • FAQs #10-16: Restriction Requirement
    • FAQs #17-21: Responding to Office Action rejections
    • FAQs #22-29: Broadening patent protection
  • Appendices
    • Appendix A: Trademark
    • Appendix B: Sample Utility Patent  
    • Appendix C: Sample Design Patent
    • Appendix D: Sample Trademark Registration
    • Appendix E: Entity Size 
    • Appendix F: Patent Laws

Popular Posts

Patent process overview
Patent process explained
How much does a patent cost?
Trademark process and costs
Patent process and costs

 

Services

Utility Patents
Design Patents
Patent Prosecution Services
Patent Defense Services
Patent-Law Counsel for In-House Attorneys
Trademark Prosecution Services
See All Services

Industries

Automotive Patents
Consumer Products Patents
Culinary Patents
Manufacturing Patents
Medical Patents
Optics Patents
Software & App Patents
See All Industries

Contact

James Yang
OC Patent Lawyer
2372 Morse Ave., Suite #178
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 433-0900

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Sitemaps

Sitemap: Pages | Sitemap: Posts

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

By accessing this blog, you agree that no attorney-client relationship is formed except by a subsequent written retainer agreement. Also, you agree to not send confidential information unless directed by me to do so. The information posted on this blog is legal information and not legal advice.
Complete Terms of Use
Complete Privacy Policy

ADA Compliance

OC Patent Lawyer aims to ensure that its services are accessible to people with disabilities.
Accessibility Statement

Service Area

From our office in Irvine, California, we serve clients from all areas within Orange County and Los Angeles County, California.

© 2023 · James Yang, Your Entrepreneur and Mid-Size Business Patent Attorney