• Home
  • About
    • Client Reviews
    • Patent Samples
    • Accolades
    • About Firm
    • Technologies
    • FAQs
  • Services
    • Patent Prosecution Services
    • Patent Defense Services
    • Patent Enforcement Services
    • Trademark Search Services
    • Trademark Prosecution Services
    • Trademark Enforcement Services
    • Trademark Defense Services
    • Patent and Trademark Licensing Services
    • Worldwide Patent and Trademark Services
    • Business Risk Management
    • Mergers and Acquisition Consulting
  • Industries
    • Automotive Patents
    • Consumer Products Patents
    • Food, Beverage, & Other Culinary Patents
    • Manufacturing Patents
    • Medical Products & Devices Patents
    • Optics Patents
    • Software & App Patents
    • See Patents in More Industries
  • Learning Resources
    • Videos on Patents
    • Search 180+ Articles
      • Patent process
        • Overview of Patent Process
          • Patent process timeline and major milestones
          • Patent Process: Invention to Patent Granted (Comprehensive)
          • Patent process, overall steps and procedures
        • Overview of the examination process within the USPTO
          • Highs and lows of securing patent protection for your invention
          • What is the Patent Office procedure after filing a patent application?
        • Benefits of a Patent Search
          • What is a patent search and How to do it?
        • Patent attorneys, agents and the USPTO can help with the patent process
        • USPTO Website
      • Invention Agreements
        • What is an NDA and when to use them?
        • How to use a contract to protect your invention?
        • Working with others without losing your IP rights
        • Patent Assignments for Independent Contractors
        • Losing Invention Rights When Hiring or Collaborating with Others
        • Avoid Problems: Get an Invention Assignment Agreement
      • Protect Inventions
        • Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
        • Do you need to get your patent attorney to sign an NDA?
        • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
        • Four types of intellectual property to protect your idea and how to use them
          • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
          • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
          • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
          • Benefits of Patent Protection
          • Best uses for design patents
        • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
          • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
          • File a patent application before telling others about the invention
        • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
          • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
        • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
          • Continuation patent application and related divisional and continuation in part
      • How Patent Applications Work: the Basics
        • How to respond to an office action?
        • Request for non-publication of a patent application
        • Anatomy of a Patent Document
        • How to write a broad patent application?
        • Design patents: pros and cons
      • Patent costs
        • How much does it cost to get a utility patent?
        • Provisional Patent Application: Cheap Alternative?
        • Patent Cost Framework and cash flow
        • Provisional patent application: a cheap option?
        • Cheap provisional patent applications
      • Patent infringement
        • Basics of writing a patent claim for a patent application
        • Patent Marking: Everything you wanted to know
        • Avoiding Patent Infringement
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product?
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product? (Design Patent)
      • Worldwide patents
        • Pros and cons of securing worldwide patent protection and their steps
        • Foreign patent filing to secure protection in other countries
      • Responding to Office Actions
        • Overview of Office Actions
      • Trademarks
        • Trademark Registration: common law, state and federal
        • How to obtain a federal trademark registration?
        • How to select a trademark?
          • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Schedule Consultation
  • Contact

Top-Rated Orange County Patent Lawyer | Helping Inventors in Orange County, Los Angeles County & Beyond | OC Patent Lawyer, Irvine CA

Orange County Patent Attorney

(949) 433-0900
You are here: Home / Patent Applications / Limits on trade dress protection when also securing a utility patent

Limits on trade dress protection when also securing a utility patent

August 9, 2017 by James Yang

Trade DressTypes of intellectual property rights

Four main types of intellectual property rights are used to protect products: patents, trademarks, trade secrets and copyrights. The product may be protected by one or more of these types of intellectual property rights. For example, a design patent may be sought for the ornamental look of the product.  Simultaneously, a utility patent may be sought for the utilitarian features of the product. Additionally, a trademark (i.e., trade dress) may be sought for the product configuration.

Example of protecting a product with multiple intellectual property rights

For example, a bottle of Coca-Cola is protected by a number of intellectual property rights. The Coca-Cola formula is protected as a trade secret. The Coca-Cola brand is a trademark. The shape of the bottle is protected as a trade dress. The bottle itself or manufacturing methods for the bottle may be protected by a patent.

Fact pattern of In re Change Wind Corp.

In In re Change Wind Corp. (TTAB July 20, 2017), the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) refused to register a trade dress on the principal register under Section 2(e)(5) of the Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(e)(5), on the grounds that the product design is functional. The applicant filed both a utility patent application and a trademark application for the trade dress of the product. A diagram of the product is shown below.

Applied-For Trade Dress

Although a product may be protected both by a utility patent and a registered trader dress, there are limits to that protection.  The following explains one of those limitations.

Trademark law specifies extent protection afforded under trade dress protection

Section 2(e)(5) of the Trademark Act provides that registration of a product design be denied if it “comprises any matter that, as a whole, is functional.” Generally, a product design or product feature is considered to be functional in a utilitarian sense if it is: (1) “essential to the use or purpose of the article;” or if it (2) “affects the cost or quality of the article.”[1]

Legal definition of functionality

The law normally reviews four nonexclusive categories of evidence in determining whether a particular design is functional:

(1) the existence of a utility patent disclosing the utilitarian advantages of the design;

(2) advertising materials in which the originator of the design touts the design’s utilitarian advantages;

(3) the availability to competitors of functionally equivalent designs; and

(4) facts indicating that the design results in a comparatively simple or cheap method of manufacturing the product.[2]

Trade dress applicant/patent owner arguments

In In re Change Wind Corp., the TTAB refused to register the trade dress on the principal register of the Trademark Office primarily for the statements made in a corresponding utility patent application (U.S. Pat. No. 9103321). The trademark applicant contended that the their corresponding patent described utilitarian advantages associated with a different part of the product and not what was shown in the applied-for trade dress such as flaps, boundary layers and spoilers of the wings.  In particular, the patent owner argued that the patent was directed to the mechanical gear drive train system. The trademark applicant also argues that the features and its marks are not functional components.

Trademark Appeal Board analysis

Unfortunately, the TTAB disagreed. The TTAB found that the features claimed in the trade dress application were necessary for the utilitarian function of the invention. One of the issues or hurdles that the patent owner/trademark applicant could not overcome was that the applied for trade dress was nearly identical to the figures used in the utility patent. (see Fig. 1A of US Pat. No. 9103321 below).  The TTAB stated that “the preferred embodiment of the invention shown in figures 1A and 1B of the patent … are in essence the applied-for mark, also shown below, except that the ‘magnetic repulsion levitated rotary wing hub’ which the helical wings attach is not displayed in the drawings for the applied-for mark, and the rods that are part of the rotary wing hub and are shown in the trademark application drawing are not claimed as part of the mark.”

Fig1A US Pat No 9103321

The TTAB examined a number of statements made in the patent which showed how various features of the applied for mark was functional. In my opinion, this may have been the reason that the trademark application was refused registration. If the look of the applied-for trade dress was not functional, then the patent drafter should have considered making the patent drawingslook differently from the applied for trade dress so as to illustrate and describe the various features separate and apart from the ornamentation shown in the applied-for trade dress. In this case, the drawings in the trade dress application appears to be identical to the patent drawings.

Another downfall of utilizing the same drawing for the applied for trade dress as in the figures of the utility patent is that now the patent owner/trade dress application now has statements made during the appeal process for the trade dress registration that may be used to limit the scope of patent protection afforded under the patent.  The patent owner/trade dress application characterized the product and the function protected by the patent.  For example, the patent owner/trade dress application argued that various features of the helical blades are nonfunctional. Moreover, the patent owner/trade dress applicant argued that the patent describes utilitarian advantages associated with mechanical gear drive train system and with components that are not found in the design sought to be registered. This statement appears to means that anything shown in the trademark application is not part of the claimed subject matter in the utility patent. This statement could be considered a disclaimer of subject matter in the patent and the patent claims cannot now be enlarged to encompass anything that is shown in the trade dress application.

I invite you to contact me with your patent questions at (949) 433-0900. Please feel free to forward this article to your friends. As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities.

[1] TrafFix Devices Inc. v. Mktg. Displays Inc., 532 U.S. 23, 58 USPQ2d 1001, 1006 (2001) (quoting Inwood Labs., Inc. v. Ives Labs., Inc., 456 U.S. 844, 214 USPQ 1, 4 n.10 (1982)).

[2] In re Morton-Norwich Prods., Inc., 671 F.2d 1332, 213 USPQ 9, 15-16 (CCPA 1982).

Related Articles for Patent Applications

  • How to respond to an office action?
  • Request for non-publication of a patent application
  • Anatomy of a patent document
  • How to write a broad patent application?
  • Design patents: pros and cons
  • How not to write the background section of a patent application?
  • Avoid disparaging prior art in patent application
  • Broad claims pose enablement issues
  • Claim Drafting Tip: Avoid means plus function claims
  • Functional language invalidates patent claim
  • Transitional phrase in a claim determines scope of patent protection
  • Patent Drafting Tip: Alternative embodiments create prior art
  • Preparing Drawings for a Utility Patent Application
  • Expedited examination at the USPTO
  • Define the invention
  • Claim scope negatively impacted due to deleted info from provisional application
  • Limits on trade dress protection when also securing a utility patent
  • Means plus function without the MEANS trigger
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Author

James Yang is a patent attorney. For more than 16 years, James Yang has been representing clients to secure patent protection for their inventions and register trademarks to protect their brands. If you need help, call him at (949) 433-0900. Read More…

Professional Profile

James Yang Business Patent Attorney

James Yang, Patent Attorney

James Yang is a patent attorney whose practice encompasses all area of intellectual law including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets. He serves clients within Orange County and Los Angeles County, California.

About James Yang

Popular Posts

  • Patent process overview
  • Patent process explained
  • How much does a patent cost?

New Book Release

Navigating the Patent System - new book by Orange County patent attorney, James Yang

Navigating the Patent System: Learn the patent process and strategies to protect your invention

Read for Free
Buy at Amazon

Peer Recognition

top attorney patent application
client choice patent application
Rated by Super Lawyers
AV Preeminent rating

RECEIVE PATENT ARTICLES

Stay up to date on major changes and get tips on the patent process.

We respect your privacy.

Popular Posts

Patent process overview
Patent process explained
How much does a patent cost?
Trademark process and costs
Patent process and costs

 

Services

  • Patent Prosecution Services
    Patent Defense Services
    Trademark Prosecution Services
    See All Services

Industries

Automotive Patents
Consumer Products Patents
Culinary Patents
Manufacturing Patents
Medical Patents
Optics Patents
Software & App Patents
See All Industries

Contact

James Yang
OC Patent Lawyer
2372 Morse Ave., Suite #178
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 433-0900

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Sitemaps

Sitemap: Pages | Sitemap: Posts

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

By accessing this blog, you agree that no attorney-client relationship is formed except by a subsequent written retainer agreement. Also, you agree to not send confidential information unless directed by me to do so. The information posted on this blog is legal information and not legal advice.
Complete Terms of Use
Complete Privacy Policy

ADA Compliance

OC Patent Lawyer aims to ensure that its services are accessible to people with disabilities.
Accessibility Statement

Service Area

From our office in Irvine, California, we serve clients from all areas within Orange County and Los Angeles County, California.

© 2022 · James Yang, Your Entrepreneur and Mid-Size Business Patent Attorney