• Home
  • About
    • Client Reviews
    • Patent Samples
    • Accolades
    • About Firm
    • Technologies
    • FAQs
  • Services
    • Patent
      • Utility Patents
      • Design Patents
      • Patent Application
      • Patent Defense
      • Patent Enforcement
      • Working with In-House Attorneys
    • Trademark
      • Trademark Search
      • Trademark Application
      • Trademark Enforcement
      • Trademark Defense
    • Licensing
    • Worldwide IP
    • Risk Management
    • Due Diligence
  • Industries
    • Browse Patent Samples
    • Automotive Patents
    • Construction Patents
    • Consumer Products Patents
    • Electronics Patents
    • Food, Beverage, & Other Culinary Patents
    • Manufacturing Patents
    • Medical Products & Devices Patents
    • Optics Patents
    • Software & App Patents
    • Tools & Equipment Patents
  • Learning Resources
    • First-Time Inventor?
    • Why Patent Your Invention in a Bad Economy?
    • Videos on Patents
    • Search 180+ Articles
      • Patent process
        • Overview of Patent Process
          • Patent process timeline and major milestones
          • Patent Process: Invention to Patent Granted (Simplified)
          • Patent process, overall steps and procedures
        • Overview of the examination process within the USPTO
          • Highs and lows of securing patent protection for your invention
          • What is the Patent Office procedure after filing a patent application?
        • Benefits of a Patent Search
          • What is a patent search and How to do it?
        • Patent attorneys, agents and the USPTO can help with the patent process
        • USPTO Website
      • Invention Agreements
        • What is an NDA and when to use them?
        • How to use a contract to protect your invention?
        • Working with others without losing your IP rights
        • Patent Assignments for Independent Contractors
        • Losing Invention Rights When Hiring or Collaborating with Others
        • Avoid Problems: Get an Invention Assignment Agreement
      • Protect Inventions
        • Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
        • Do you need to get your patent attorney to sign an NDA?
        • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
        • Four types of intellectual property to protect your idea and how to use them
          • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
          • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
          • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
          • Benefits of Patent Protection
          • Best uses for design patents
        • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
          • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
          • File a patent application before telling others about the invention
        • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
          • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
        • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
          • What is a continuation patent application?
      • How Patent Applications Work: the Basics
        • How to respond to an office action?
        • Request for non-publication of a patent application
        • Anatomy of a Patent Document
        • How to write a broad patent application?
        • Design patents: pros and cons
      • Patent costs
        • How much does it cost to get a utility patent?
        • Provisional Patent Application: Cheap Alternative?
        • Patent Cost Framework and cash flow
        • Provisional patent application: a cheap option?
        • Cheap provisional patent applications
      • Patent infringement
        • Basics of writing a patent claim for a patent application
        • Patent Marking: Everything you wanted to know
        • Avoiding Patent Infringement
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product?
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product? (Design Patent)
      • Worldwide patents
        • Pros and cons of securing worldwide patent protection and their steps
        • Foreign patent filing to secure protection in other countries
      • Responding to Office Actions
        • Overview of Office Actions
      • Trademarks
        • Trademark Registration: common law, state and federal
        • How to obtain a federal trademark registration?
        • How to select a trademark?
          • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Schedule Consultation
  • Contact

Top-Rated Orange County Patent Lawyer | Helping Inventors in Orange County, Los Angeles County & Beyond | OC Patent Lawyer, Irvine CA

Orange County Patent Attorney

(949) 433-0900
You are here: Home / Patent Infringement / Patent Damages / Lost foreign profits recoverable by patent owners

Lost foreign profits recoverable by patent owners

June 27, 2018 by James Yang

Lost Foreign ProfitsLost foreign profits are defined as profits that the patent owner could have made overseas or outside of the United States.  Normally, patent owners can only recover for lost profits that they incur based on a competitor’s activity within the United States.  To put it differently, patent owners generally cannot recover for lost foreign profits based on activity outside of the United States.  In WesternGeco LLC v. Ion Geophysical Corp (S. Ct. 2018), the Supreme Court held that recovery of lost foreign profits is permissible in some cases, as discussed below.

Lost foreign profits are permissible

To clarify the holding, the Supreme Court emphasized that this opinion only deals with the permissibility of awarding lost foreign profits.  Lost foreign profits are not mandatory.  For example, to limit exposure, competitors are free to argue that the infringing activities was not the proximate cause of the lost profits.  In support thereof, footnote 3 of the opinion stated that “In reaching this holding, we do not address the extent to which other doctrines, such as proximate cause, could limit or preclude damages in particular cases.”  As such, this opinion is good news for patent owners but has its limits.

Fact pattern of WesternGeco LLC

The specific facts of this case are discussed below.  The patent owner (Westerngeco) owns patents related to a system for surveying the ocean floor.  The system uses lateral-steering technology to produce higher quality data than prior art survey systems.  In its business structure, the patent owner “does not sell its technology or license it to competitors.  Instead, it uses the technology itself, performing survey for oil and gas companies.”

The infringer (ION Geophysical Corp.) “began selling a competing system.  It manufactured the components for its competing system in the United States and then shipped them to companies abroad.  Those companies combined the components to create a surveying system indistinguishable from WesternGeco’s and used the system to compete with WesternGeco.”

The patent owner (WesternGeco) lost 10 contracts outside of the United States because of the infringer’s activity of selling a component part and exporting such components overseas for assembly into the infringing product.  The patent owner could have made a profit of $12.5 million on those contracts, and thus was awarded that amount in damages.

Activities that constitute patent infringement

A patent provides a patent owner a right to exclude others from making, using, offering to sell, or selling within the United States or importing any patented invention into the United States.  When patent attorneys explain the rights that a patent gives the patent owner, this is the bundle of rights that are listed and is based on 35 USC 271(a).  These rights are all based on activities based within the United States and any damage award is based on a competitor’s activity within the United States as well.  However, Section 271 has other sections that provide other patent rights which if violated constitutes patent infringement.

Under Section 271(b), inducing someone else to infringe a patent constitutes patent infringement.

Under Section 271(c), importing a unique component especially made for a patented machine constitutes patent infringement.

Under Section 271(f)(1), whoever without authority supplies or causes to be supplied in or from the United States all or a substantial portion of the components of a patented invention, where such components are uncombined in whole or in part, in such manner as to actively induce the combination of such components outside of the United States in a manner that would infringe the patent if such combination occurred within the United States, shall be liable as an infringer.

Under Section 271(f)(2),  whoever without authority supplies or causes to be supplied in or from the United States any component of a patented invention that is especially made or especially adapted for use in the invention and not a staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial noninfringing use, where such component is uncombined in whole or in part, knowing that such component is so made or adapted and intending that such component will be combined outside of the United States in a manner that would infringe the patent if such combination occurred within the United States, shall be liable as an infringer.

Under Section 271(g), importing a product made by a patented process into the United States constitutes patent infringement.

In the instant case, the infringer was found to infringe the patent based on Section 271(f)(2) listed above. They supplied a unique component of the patented invention from within the United States which was then assembled outside of the United States into a product that infringed the patent.

Analysis of whether lost foreign profits is permissible

Now, the issue before the court was whether the infringer is liable for the lost profits that the patent owner would have made on those 10 lost foreign contracts or for something less such as the lost profits for the unique component sold by the infringer to others.  Presumably, the profit on 10 components would be substantially less than the service contract using those components.

In general, courts presume that federal statutes like the patent statute apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.  However, this presumption can be overcome which in this case it was.  The basic reason was that the type of infringing activity that was being regulated was that of “exporting” components from the United States.  The court also referenced Section 284 which sets an award of damages for patent infringement so that the damage aware completely compensates the patent owner due to the infringement.  To compensate the patent owner, this includes lost profits but also includes lost foreign profits.

This case dealt with the availability of lost foreign sales based on infringement under Section 271(f)(2) but the court expressly stated that this holding does not apply to infringement under Section 271(f)(1).  Section 271(f)(2) addresses the activity of supplying a unique component of a patented invention from the U.S. to outside the U.S., whereas Section 271(f)(1) addresses activities of supplying a generic component from the United States to a foreign country and inducing others to infringe use the component outside of the U.S. to infringe the patent.  Because of the differences in standards for what constitutes infringement under the two subsections, the court reserved the decision as to whether recovery of lost foreign sales for infringement under Section 271(f)(1) for a later date.

I invite you to contact me with your patent questions at (949) 433-0900. Please feel free to forward this article to your friends. As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Author

James Yang is a patent attorney. For more than 16 years, James Yang has been representing clients to secure patent protection for their inventions and register trademarks to protect their brands. If you need help, call him at (949) 433-0900. Read More…

Popular Posts

  • Patent process overview
  • Patent process explained
  • How much does a patent cost?
  • Why patent your invention in a bad economy?

Patent Book

Navigating the Patent System - new book by Orange County patent attorney, James Yang

Navigating the Patent System: Learn the patent process and strategies to protect your invention

Read for Free
Buy at Amazon

RECEIVE PATENT ARTICLES

Stay up to date on major changes and get tips on the patent process.

We respect your privacy.

Popular Posts

Patent process overview
Patent process explained
How much does a patent cost?
Trademark process and costs
Patent process and costs

 

Services

Utility Patents
Design Patents
Patent Prosecution Services
Patent Defense Services
Patent-Law Counsel for In-House Attorneys
Trademark Prosecution Services
See All Services

Industries

Automotive Patents
Consumer Products Patents
Culinary Patents
Manufacturing Patents
Medical Patents
Optics Patents
Software & App Patents
See All Industries

Contact

James Yang
OC Patent Lawyer
2372 Morse Ave., Suite #178
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 433-0900

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Sitemaps

Sitemap: Pages | Sitemap: Posts

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

By accessing this blog, you agree that no attorney-client relationship is formed except by a subsequent written retainer agreement. Also, you agree to not send confidential information unless directed by me to do so. The information posted on this blog is legal information and not legal advice.
Complete Terms of Use
Complete Privacy Policy

ADA Compliance

OC Patent Lawyer aims to ensure that its services are accessible to people with disabilities.
Accessibility Statement

Service Area

From our office in Irvine, California, we serve clients from all areas within Orange County and Los Angeles County, California.

© 2023 · James Yang, Your Entrepreneur and Mid-Size Business Patent Attorney