• Home
  • About
    • Client Reviews
    • Patent Samples
    • Accolades
    • About Firm
    • Technologies
    • FAQs
  • Services
    • Patent
      • Utility Patents
      • Design Patents
      • Patent Application
      • Patent Defense
      • Patent Enforcement
      • Working with In-House Attorneys
    • Trademark
      • Trademark Search
      • Trademark Application
      • Trademark Enforcement
      • Trademark Defense
    • Licensing
    • Worldwide IP
    • Risk Management
    • Due Diligence
  • Industries
    • Browse Patent Samples
    • Automotive Patents
    • Construction Patents
    • Consumer Products Patents
    • Electronics Patents
    • Food, Beverage, & Other Culinary Patents
    • Manufacturing Patents
    • Medical Products & Devices Patents
    • Optics Patents
    • Software & App Patents
    • Tools & Equipment Patents
  • Learning Resources
    • First-Time Inventor?
    • Why Patent Your Invention in a Bad Economy?
    • Videos on Patents
    • Search 180+ Articles
      • Patent process
        • Overview of Patent Process
          • Patent process timeline and major milestones
          • Patent Process: Invention to Patent Granted (Simplified)
          • Patent process, overall steps and procedures
        • Overview of the examination process within the USPTO
          • Highs and lows of securing patent protection for your invention
          • What is the Patent Office procedure after filing a patent application?
        • Benefits of a Patent Search
          • What is a patent search and How to do it?
        • Patent attorneys, agents and the USPTO can help with the patent process
        • USPTO Website
      • Invention Agreements
        • What is an NDA and when to use them?
        • How to use a contract to protect your invention?
        • Working with others without losing your IP rights
        • Patent Assignments for Independent Contractors
        • Losing Invention Rights When Hiring or Collaborating with Others
        • Avoid Problems: Get an Invention Assignment Agreement
      • Protect Inventions
        • Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
        • Do you need to get your patent attorney to sign an NDA?
        • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
        • Four types of intellectual property to protect your idea and how to use them
          • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
          • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
          • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
          • Benefits of Patent Protection
          • Best uses for design patents
        • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
          • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
          • File a patent application before telling others about the invention
        • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
          • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
        • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
          • What is a continuation patent application?
      • How Patent Applications Work: the Basics
        • How to respond to an office action?
        • Request for non-publication of a patent application
        • Anatomy of a Patent Document
        • How to write a broad patent application?
        • Design patents: pros and cons
      • Patent costs
        • How much does it cost to get a utility patent?
        • Provisional Patent Application: Cheap Alternative?
        • Patent Cost Framework and cash flow
        • Provisional patent application: a cheap option?
        • Cheap provisional patent applications
      • Patent infringement
        • Basics of writing a patent claim for a patent application
        • Patent Marking: Everything you wanted to know
        • Avoiding Patent Infringement
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product?
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product? (Design Patent)
      • Worldwide patents
        • Pros and cons of securing worldwide patent protection and their steps
        • Foreign patent filing to secure protection in other countries
      • Responding to Office Actions
        • Overview of Office Actions
      • Trademarks
        • Trademark Registration: common law, state and federal
        • How to obtain a federal trademark registration?
        • How to select a trademark?
          • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Schedule Consultation
  • Contact

Top-Rated Orange County Patent Lawyer | Helping Inventors in Orange County, Los Angeles County & Beyond | OC Patent Lawyer, Irvine CA

Orange County Patent Attorney

(949) 433-0900
You are here: Home / Patent application process / Before filing a patent application / Bars to Patentability / Pitfalls of one year grace period under the FITF rules

Pitfalls of one year grace period under the FITF rules

September 9, 2015 by James Yang

pitfallsofFITFUnder current U.S. patent laws, the first inventor to file (FITF) a patent application on an invention is awarded the patent.  This means that if two individuals separately file patent applications on the same idea, then the person who first filed its patent application in the U.S. Patent Office will be awarded the patent.  The Patent Office merely looks to the filing dates of the respective patent applications to determine who will be awarded the patent. Exceptions to this rule exist but generally have limited value.

To fully understand the first inventor to file (FITF) rule, it is crucial to also keep in mind how the bars to patentability and the one year grace period play into each other.  The FITF rule retained the one year grace period under the old first to invent rule, but with significant limitations.  Under the first inventor to file (FITF) rule, the inventor can technically market the invention to others and wait up to one year to file a patent application (i.e., one year grace period).  Marketing efforts relate to the traditional bars to patentability such as demonstrating the invention to the public (i.e., public use), publicly offering the invention for sale (public offer for sale) or distributing a printed publication of the invention (i.e.., printed publication).

Unfortunately, as discussed below, if the inventor files the patent application after the start of marketing efforts, then under the first inventor to file rules, then inventor is lulled into a false sense of security.  To understand this better, let’s compare the new one year grace period under the new first inventor to file rule with the old one year grace period under the old first to invent rule.

Under the old one year grace period and old first to invent rule, if a third party steals the inventor’s idea and submits a patent application before the inventor, then inventor can swear behind the filing date of the third party’s patent application even though the inventor had waited to file the patent application and filed its patent application after the third party.  The inventor can do this by relying on its date of invention which will be prior to the filing date of the third party’s patent application.  If this is not so, then the third party couldn’t have stolen the invention from the inventor.    The “swearing behind” process is fairly inexpensive.  The inventor submits a document during examination of a patent application to the examiner with evidence showing a prior date of invention.  Swearing behind disqualifies the third party’s patent application as prior art so that it does not block the inventor from obtaining a patent.

Under the old law, if the claims presented in the inventor’s patent application and the third party’s patent application are so similar that they are essentially claims to the same invention, then the proper procedure was an interference proceeding where the Patent Office conducts a mini-trial to determine who was the first inventor.  However, interferences were seldom instituted and the above conflict between the inventor and the third party was for the most part resolved by swearing behind the third party’s patent application.

In contrast, under the current, new first inventor to file (FITF) rule, the inventor still has some recourse against the third party by filing a derivation proceedings to determine whether the third party is a true inventor.  However, such proceedings are expensive compared to the relatively inexpensive process of swearing behind the third party’s patent application under the first to invent rule.

The FITF rule also allows one to file a declaration that the inventor first published the invention prior to the filing date of the third party’s patent application.  However, this does not disqualify the entirety of the third party’s patent application as prior art and can still block the inventor from obtaining a broad claim for patent.

Under the FITF rule, the inventor may have valid and enforceable rights against the third party.  However, in this early stage of marketing the product or idea, many companies and inventors will not proceed with the derivation proceeding due to the risk and expense of the derivation proceeding.  Also, even if the inventor can avoid the derivation proceeding, the third party’s patent application is still prior art and in certain circumstances may completely block the inventor from obtaining a broad claim for patent protection.

These reasons explain why it is bad idea to market an invention before filing a patent application under the current new FITF rule.  The inventor is at risk of expending a great deal of time and money on marketing and prototyping only to find out years later that a third party has filed a patent application before the inventor which may block the inventor from obtaining a patent.

I invite you to contact me with your patent questions at (949) 433-0900. Please feel free to forward this article to your friends. As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Author

James Yang is a patent attorney. For more than 16 years, James Yang has been representing clients to secure patent protection for their inventions and register trademarks to protect their brands. If you need help, call him at (949) 433-0900. Read More…

Popular Posts

  • Patent process overview
  • Patent process explained
  • How much does a patent cost?
  • Why patent your invention in a bad economy?

Patent Book

Navigating the Patent System - new book by Orange County patent attorney, James Yang

Navigating the Patent System: Learn the patent process and strategies to protect your invention

Read for Free
Buy at Amazon

RECEIVE PATENT ARTICLES

Stay up to date on major changes and get tips on the patent process.

We respect your privacy.

Popular Posts

Patent process overview
Patent process explained
How much does a patent cost?
Trademark process and costs
Patent process and costs

 

Services

Utility Patents
Design Patents
Patent Prosecution Services
Patent Defense Services
Patent-Law Counsel for In-House Attorneys
Trademark Prosecution Services
See All Services

Industries

Automotive Patents
Consumer Products Patents
Culinary Patents
Manufacturing Patents
Medical Patents
Optics Patents
Software & App Patents
See All Industries

Contact

James Yang
OC Patent Lawyer
2372 Morse Ave., Suite #178
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 433-0900

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Sitemaps

Sitemap: Pages | Sitemap: Posts

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

By accessing this blog, you agree that no attorney-client relationship is formed except by a subsequent written retainer agreement. Also, you agree to not send confidential information unless directed by me to do so. The information posted on this blog is legal information and not legal advice.
Complete Terms of Use
Complete Privacy Policy

ADA Compliance

OC Patent Lawyer aims to ensure that its services are accessible to people with disabilities.
Accessibility Statement

Service Area

From our office in Irvine, California, we serve clients from all areas within Orange County and Los Angeles County, California.

© 2023 · James Yang, Your Entrepreneur and Mid-Size Business Patent Attorney