• Home
  • About
    • Client Reviews
    • Patent Samples
    • Accolades
    • About Firm
    • Technologies
    • FAQs
  • Services
    • Patent Prosecution Services
    • Patent Defense Services
    • Patent Enforcement Services
    • Trademark Search Services
    • Trademark Prosecution Services
    • Trademark Enforcement Services
    • Trademark Defense Services
    • Patent and Trademark Licensing Services
    • Worldwide Patent and Trademark Services
    • Business Risk Management
    • Mergers and Acquisition Consulting
  • Industries
    • Automotive Patents
    • Consumer Products Patents
    • Food, Beverage, & Other Culinary Patents
    • Manufacturing Patents
    • Medical Products & Devices Patents
    • Optics Patents
    • Software & App Patents
    • See Patents in More Industries
  • Learning Resources
    • Videos on Patents
    • Search 180+ Articles
      • Patent process
        • Overview of Patent Process
          • Patent process timeline and major milestones
          • Patent Process: Invention to Patent Granted (Comprehensive)
          • Patent process, overall steps and procedures
        • Overview of the examination process within the USPTO
          • Highs and lows of securing patent protection for your invention
          • What is the Patent Office procedure after filing a patent application?
        • Benefits of a Patent Search
          • What is a patent search and How to do it?
        • Patent attorneys, agents and the USPTO can help with the patent process
        • USPTO Website
      • Invention Agreements
        • What is an NDA and when to use them?
        • How to use a contract to protect your invention?
        • Working with others without losing your IP rights
        • Patent Assignments for Independent Contractors
        • Losing Invention Rights When Hiring or Collaborating with Others
        • Avoid Problems: Get an Invention Assignment Agreement
      • Protect Inventions
        • Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
        • Do you need to get your patent attorney to sign an NDA?
        • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
        • Four types of intellectual property to protect your idea and how to use them
          • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
          • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
          • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
          • Benefits of Patent Protection
          • Best uses for design patents
        • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
          • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
          • File a patent application before telling others about the invention
        • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
          • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
        • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
          • Continuation patent application and related divisional and continuation in part
      • How Patent Applications Work: the Basics
        • How to respond to an office action?
        • Request for non-publication of a patent application
        • Anatomy of a Patent Document
        • How to write a broad patent application?
        • Design patents: pros and cons
      • Patent costs
        • How much does it cost to get a utility patent?
        • Provisional Patent Application: Cheap Alternative?
        • Patent Cost Framework and cash flow
        • Provisional patent application: a cheap option?
        • Cheap provisional patent applications
      • Patent infringement
        • Basics of writing a patent claim for a patent application
        • Patent Marking: Everything you wanted to know
        • Avoiding Patent Infringement
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product?
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product? (Design Patent)
      • Worldwide patents
        • Pros and cons of securing worldwide patent protection and their steps
        • Foreign patent filing to secure protection in other countries
      • Responding to Office Actions
        • Overview of Office Actions
      • Trademarks
        • Trademark Registration: common law, state and federal
        • How to obtain a federal trademark registration?
        • How to select a trademark?
          • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Schedule Consultation
  • Contact

Top-Rated Orange County Patent Lawyer | Helping Inventors in Orange County, Los Angeles County & Beyond | OC Patent Lawyer, Irvine CA

Orange County Patent Attorney

(949) 433-0900
You are here: Home / Patent Infringement / Patent Infringement Defenses / Section 271 determines whether global sales infringes a US patent

Section 271 determines whether global sales infringes a US patent

November 30, 2016 by James Yang

Global CommerceUnder Section 271(a), activities considered to be infringing a patent when performed wholly in the United States may be transformed into non-infringing activities if some of those activities are performed outside of the United States. In this sense, a company’s global operations may help the company to avoid patent infringement liability.

35 USC Section 271(a) states that:

“Whoever without authority makes, uses, offers to sell, or sells any patented invention, within the United States, or imports into the United States any patented invention during the term of the patent therefore, infringes the patent.” (Emphasis added).

In Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc. (Fed. Cir. August 5, 2016), the accused infringer (Pulse) performed certain negotiations and contracting activities within the United States. However, the goods were manufactured, ordered, invoiced, shipped and delivered outside of the United States. The issue was, assuming that the goods were infringing the claims of the patent, whether there was a sale or offers to sell the goods within the United States in order to impose patent infringement liability.

  1. Sale within the United States Under Section 271

The Federal Circuit described the accused infringer’s activities regarding the sales transaction as predominantly occurring outside of the United States. For these types of sales, the Federal Circuit examined whether the activities that remained inside the United States were sufficient to constitute a “sale” under section 271(a). The Federal Circuit focused on the location where title to the property was transferred based on the agreement of the parties and the location of actual or anticipated performance. In the present case, the defendant (Pulse) had a general business agreement but that agreement was not a contract to sell any specific product. Rather the vast majority of activities involving the sale occurred outside of the United States. Purchase orders were sent to Pulse’s office outside of the United States from foreign contract manufacturers. Pulse was paid abroad by those contract manufacturers. The product was manufactured outside of the United States. Finally, the Federal Circuit said that any doubt was resolved by the presumption against extraterritorial application of United States laws.

To determine whether a sale occurred within the United States within the meaning of Section 271, the courts look at a spectrum of activities including both the location of contract formation as well as performance of the contract.

  1. Offer to sell within the United States Under Section 271

Section 271(a) also provides for infringement if an accused patent infringer offers to sell a patented invention within the United States. Even if the sale is not consummated by the buyer, the seller could be liable for patent infringement based on an offer to sell under Section 271. In this regard, the Federal Circuit reiterated its holding that “the location of the contemplated sale controls whether there is an offer to sell within the United States.” (Emphasis in original). Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. Maersk Contractors USA, Inc., 617 F.3d 1296 (Fed. Cir. 2010).  In Transocean, contract negotiations occurred outside the United States for delivery and performance in the United States. That court held that the location of the contemplated sale controlled and that the offer to sell infringed the patent at issue under Section 271.

In the instant case, the opposite situation was before the court. Negotiations occurred in the United States but the contemplated sale occurred outside the United States. The court adopted the same reasoning in Transocean and concluded that Pulse did not directly infringe the Halo patents under the “offer to sell” provision by offering to sell in the United States the products at issue, because the locations of the contemplated sales were outside the United States.  In this situation, the court also required that “an offer to sell, in order to be an infringement, must be an offer contemplating sale in the United States.” (emphasis added).  In this case the parties did not want to complete the sale in the United States, and thus there was no patent infringement.

For the “offer to sell” provision, the location of the delivery and performance of the products at issue was determinative as to whether the “offer to sell” is within or outside the United States.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Author

James Yang is a patent attorney. For more than 16 years, James Yang has been representing clients to secure patent protection for their inventions and register trademarks to protect their brands. If you need help, call him at (949) 433-0900. Read More…

Professional Profile

James Yang Business Patent Attorney

James Yang, Patent Attorney

James Yang is a patent attorney whose practice encompasses all area of intellectual law including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets. He serves clients within Orange County and Los Angeles County, California.

About James Yang

Popular Posts

  • Patent process overview
  • Patent process explained
  • How much does a patent cost?

New Book Release

Navigating the Patent System - new book by Orange County patent attorney, James Yang

Navigating the Patent System: Learn the patent process and strategies to protect your invention

Read for Free
Buy at Amazon

Peer Recognition

top attorney patent application
client choice patent application
Rated by Super Lawyers
AV Preeminent rating

RECEIVE PATENT ARTICLES

Stay up to date on major changes and get tips on the patent process.

We respect your privacy.

Popular Posts

Patent process overview
Patent process explained
How much does a patent cost?
Trademark process and costs
Patent process and costs

 

Services

  • Patent Prosecution Services
    Patent Defense Services
    Trademark Prosecution Services
    See All Services

Industries

Automotive Patents
Consumer Products Patents
Culinary Patents
Manufacturing Patents
Medical Patents
Optics Patents
Software & App Patents
See All Industries

Contact

James Yang
OC Patent Lawyer
2372 Morse Ave., Suite #178
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 433-0900

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Sitemaps

Sitemap: Pages | Sitemap: Posts

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

By accessing this blog, you agree that no attorney-client relationship is formed except by a subsequent written retainer agreement. Also, you agree to not send confidential information unless directed by me to do so. The information posted on this blog is legal information and not legal advice.
Complete Terms of Use
Complete Privacy Policy

ADA Compliance

OC Patent Lawyer aims to ensure that its services are accessible to people with disabilities.
Accessibility Statement

Service Area

From our office in Irvine, California, we serve clients from all areas within Orange County and Los Angeles County, California.

© 2022 · James Yang, Your Entrepreneur and Mid-Size Business Patent Attorney