• Home
  • About Me
    • Client Reviews
    • Patent Samples
    • Accolades
    • About Firm
    • Technologies
    • FAQs
  • Services
    • Patent Prosecution Services
    • Patent Defense Services
    • Patent Enforcement Services
    • Trademark Search Services
    • Trademark Prosecution Services
    • Trademark Enforcement Services
    • Trademark Defense Services
    • Patent and Trademark Licensing Services
    • Worldwide Patent and Trademark Services
  • Learning Resources
    • Invention Agreements
      • What is an NDA and when to use them?
      • How to use a contract to protect your invention?
      • Working with others without losing your IP rights
      • Patent Assignments for Independent Contractors
      • Losing Invention Rights When Hiring or Collaborating with Others
      • Avoid Problems: Get an Invention Assignment Agreement
    • Protect Inventions
      • Do you need to get your patent attorney to sign an NDA?
      • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
      • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
      • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
      • Four types of intellectual property to protect your idea and how to use them
      • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
      • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
      • File a patent application before telling others about the invention
      • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
      • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
      • Best uses for design patents
      • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
      • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
      • Benefits of Patent Protection
      • Continuation patent application and related divisional and continuation in part
      • Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
    • How Patent Applications Work: the Basics
      • How to respond to an office action?
      • Request for non-publication of a patent application
      • Anatomy of a Patent Document
      • How to write a broad patent application?
      • Design patents: pros and cons
    • Patent process
      • Overview of the examination process within the USPTO
      • What is a patent search and How to do it?
      • Patent attorneys, agents and the USPTO can help with the patent process
      • Highs and lows of securing patent protection for your invention
      • Patent Process: Invention to Patent Granted (Comprehensive)
      • Benefits of a Patent Search
      • Overview of Patent Process
      • Patent process timeline and major milestones
      • Patent process, overall steps and procedures
      • What is the Patent Office procedure after filing a patent application?
      • USPTO Website
    • Patent costs
      • How much does it cost to get a utility patent?
      • Provisional Patent Application: Cheap Alternative?
      • Patent Cost Framework and cash flow
      • Provisional patent application: a cheap option?
      • Cheap provisional patent applications
    • Worldwide patents
      • Pros and cons of securing worldwide patent protection and their steps
      • Foreign patent filing to secure protection in other countries
    • Responding to Office Actions
      • Overview of Office Actions
    • Patent infringement
      • Basics of writing a patent claim for a patent application
      • What are the patent marking requirements and its benefits?
      • Avoiding Patent Infringement
      • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product?
      • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product? (Design Patent)
    • Trademarks
      • Trademark Registration: common law, state and federal
      • How to obtain a federal trademark registration?
      • How to select a trademark?
        • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Schedule Consultation
  • Contact

Patent Attorney | Orange County | OC Patent Lawyer

Orange County Patent Attorney

(949) 433-0900
You are here: Home / Patent Infringement / Indirect Infringement / New non-infringement defense to inducement of patent infringement

New non-infringement defense to inducement of patent infringement

November 1, 2013 by James Yang

Federal Circuit creates a new defense to inducement of patent infringement

New Non infringement defenseIn Commil v Cisco (Fed. Cir. June 25, 2013), the patent owner sued the alleged infringer for inducement of patent infringement.  This occurs when a third party may not necessarily be infringing the patent but is encouraging another to infringe the patent.  To prove inducement of infringement, the patent owner must show that the defendant had the specific intent to induce a third party to infringe a patent.  In this case, the issue was whether the alleged infringer could have the specific intent to induce another to infringe a patent if the alleged infringer had a good faith belief that the patent is invalid?

Previously, the courts did not look to whether the alleged infringer believed the patent to be invalid in determining the intent of the alleged infringer.  Invalidity, as far as the courts were concerned, did not affect one’s intent to induce another to infringe a patent.  In Commil v. Cisco, a three (3) member panel of the Federal Circuit held that the good faith belief of invalidity is a factor that the lower court should have considered to determine whether the alleged infringer had the requisite intent to induce another to infringe a patent.  The three member panel stated that “it is axiomatic that one cannot infringe an invalid patent.”  With this, the three member panel concluded that a good faith belief that a patent is invalid also mitigates the requisite intent to induce another to infringe.

This reduces the number of potential infringers that may be liable for inducement of patent infringement. Simply put, defendants who would have been found liable for inducement of infringement is now no longer liable for patent infringement.  The court reduces the likelihood that the patent owner can obtain a judgment based on inducement of infringement.

The patent owner in Commil petitioned the Federal Circuit to re-hear the case en banc.  The patent owner wanted all twelve of the judges to hear the case and not just three members. The petition was denied by a narrow 6-5 vote which means that the holding of Commil is now case law.  (En Banc Petition Denied Fed. Cir. Oct. 25, 2013).

This case could be expanded to apply to the willful infringement analysis as well.  If an invalid patent cannot be infringed, then how could one form the intent to willfully infringe a patent that is invalid since it cannot be infringed?  The argument seems to be fairly basic and straight forward from the axiom that an invalid patent cannot be infringed.  The power of finding willful infringement is that the patent owner can ask the court to have the defendant pay for the patent owner’s attorney fees which may be significant.  Based on the reasoning given in Commil, an opinion of invalidity of a patent by patent counsel should also mitigate a charge of willful infringement in addition to inducement of patent infringement.

This case is important because it creates a new non infringement defense to induced infringement.  But, it also increases the value of opinion of counsel of invalidity to mitigate a charge of induced patent infringement and also willful infringement.

I invite you to contact me with your patent questions at (949) 433-0900 or [email protected]. Please feel free to forward this article to your friends. As an Irvine Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Filed Under: Indirect Infringement, Patent Damages, Patent Infringement, Patent Infringement Defenses Tagged With: Active Inducement of Infringement, Invalidity, Willful Infringement

Author: James Yang

Helping entrepreneurs and mid-size businesses since 2004. Call me at (949) 433-0900 to schedule your free initial consultation. Read More…

Covid-19

Covid-19: We are fully operational.  Due to Covid-19, all meetings are conducted via zoom.

Professional Profile

James Yang Business Patent Attorney

James Yang, Patent Attorney

James Yang is a patent attorney whose practice encompasses all area of intellectual law including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets. Professional Profile

Popular Posts

  • Patent process overview
  • Patent process explained
  • How much does a patent cost?

New Book Release

Navigating the Patent System - new book by Orange County patent attorney, James Yang

Navigating the Patent System: Learn the patent process and strategies to protect your invention

Read for Free
Buy at Amazon

Peer Recognition

top attorney patent application
client choice patent application
Rated by Super Lawyers
AV Preeminent rating

RECEIVE PATENT UPDATES

Stay up to date on major changes and get tips on patent prosecution.

We respect your privacy.

Popular Posts

Patent process overview
Patent process explained
How much does a patent cost?
Trademark process and costs
Patent process and costs

 

Services

  • Patent Prosecution Services
    Patent Defense Services
    Trademark Prosecution Services
    See All Services

Contact

James Yang
OC Patent Lawyer
2372 Morse Ave., Suite #178
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 433-0900

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Sitemaps

Sitemap: Pages | Sitemap: Posts

Terms of Use

By accessing this blog, you agree that no attorney-client relationship is formed except by a subsequent written retainer agreement. Also, you agree to not send confidential information unless directed by me to do so. The information posted on this blog is legal information and not legal advice.
Complete terms of use

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT

© 2021 · James Yang, Your Entrepreneur and Mid-Size Business Patent Attorney