• Home
  • About Me
    • Client Reviews
    • Patent Samples
    • Accolades
    • About Firm
    • Technologies
    • FAQs
  • Services
    • Patent Prosecution Services
    • Patent Defense Services
    • Patent Enforcement Services
    • Trademark Search Services
    • Trademark Prosecution Services
    • Trademark Enforcement Services
    • Trademark Defense Services
    • Patent and Trademark Licensing Services
    • Worldwide Patent and Trademark Services
  • Learning Resources
    • Invention Agreements
      • What is an NDA and when to use them?
      • How to use a contract to protect your invention?
      • Working with others without losing your IP rights
      • Patent Assignments for Independent Contractors
      • Losing Invention Rights When Hiring or Collaborating with Others
      • Avoid Problems: Get an Invention Assignment Agreement
    • Protect Inventions
      • Do you need to get your patent attorney to sign an NDA?
      • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
      • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
      • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
      • Four types of intellectual property to protect your idea and how to use them
      • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
      • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
      • File a patent application before telling others about the invention
      • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
      • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
      • Best uses for design patents
      • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
      • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
      • Benefits of Patent Protection
      • Continuation patent application and related divisional and continuation in part
      • Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
    • How Patent Applications Work: the Basics
      • How to respond to an office action?
      • Request for non-publication of a patent application
      • Anatomy of a Patent Document
      • How to write a broad patent application?
      • Design patents: pros and cons
    • Patent process
      • Overview of the examination process within the USPTO
      • What is a patent search and How to do it?
      • Patent attorneys, agents and the USPTO can help with the patent process
      • Highs and lows of securing patent protection for your invention
      • Patent Process: Invention to Patent Granted (Comprehensive)
      • Benefits of a Patent Search
      • Overview of Patent Process
      • Patent process timeline and major milestones
      • Patent process, overall steps and procedures
      • What is the Patent Office procedure after filing a patent application?
      • USPTO Website
    • Patent costs
      • How much does it cost to get a utility patent?
      • Provisional Patent Application: Cheap Alternative?
      • Patent Cost Framework and cash flow
      • Provisional patent application: a cheap option?
      • Cheap provisional patent applications
    • Worldwide patents
      • Pros and cons of securing worldwide patent protection and their steps
      • Foreign patent filing to secure protection in other countries
    • Responding to Office Actions
      • Overview of Office Actions
    • Patent infringement
      • Basics of writing a patent claim for a patent application
      • What are the patent marking requirements and its benefits?
      • Avoiding Patent Infringement
      • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product?
      • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product? (Design Patent)
    • Trademarks
      • Trademark Registration: common law, state and federal
      • How to obtain a federal trademark registration?
      • How to select a trademark?
        • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Schedule Consultation
  • Contact

Patent Attorney | Orange County | OC Patent Lawyer

Orange County Patent Attorney

(949) 433-0900
You are here: Home / Patent Infringement / Patent Damages / Power given to district courts to stop abusive litigation tactics

Power given to district courts to stop abusive litigation tactics

July 7, 2014 by James Yang

Power given to district court to fight abusive litigation tactics

In the United States, each party generally pays their own attorney fees.  Shifting attorney fees to the non-prevailing party is permitted in certain circumstances. For example, in patent litigation, fee shifting is permitted for exceptional cases.  35 U.S.C. Section 285 states that “the court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party.”  The threat of fee shifting forces the parties to avoid unsavory tactics and helps keep parties on good behavior.  Unfortunately, prior to the Supreme Court’s opinion in Octane Fitness (S.Ct. 2014), which I’ve previously discussed, the standards were so difficult to meet that fee shifting rarely occurred even though U.S. Patent laws expressly allowed it.

Thefollowing case, Highmark v. Allcare Health (S.Ct. 2014), together with Octane Fitness gives power back to the district courts to stop abusive litigation tactics by patent owners and Non practicing entities (e.g., patent trolls), and even infringers with meritless defenses.  Octane Fitness lowered the standards for awarding attorney fees and thus increased the types of situations (e.g., litigation tactics) that a judge could deem exceptional and award attorney fees.  Highmark changes the review standard on appeal and reduces the likelihood that the award of attorney fees would be overturned on appeal.  In other words, the award of attorney fees to the prevailing party is now much more likely to be upheld on appeal.  This means that if the offending losing  party utilizes abusive litigation tactics that are out of the ordinary, then the district court has the power to reign in such behavior by awarding attorney fees to the prevailing party.

In Highmark, theSupreme Court raised the standard by which an appellate court (i.e., Federal Circuit) can overturn a district court’s determination that a case is exceptional and fee shifting appropriate. Previously, the lower court’s determination that a case was exceptional and fee shifting appropriate was reviewed de novo.  The appellate court gave no deference to the lower court’s determination about the strength of the case and the litigation tactics of the non-prevailing party.  They reviewed the decision based solely on the documentation through the lens of their own personal views as to what conduct warranted an award of attorney fees.  The downside to de novo review is that the personalities of the parties are difficult to gage on paper and essentially takes away the advantage the lower court has from personally interacting with the parties over a longer period of time.

Under Highmark, theCourt  held that all aspects of the district court’s determination on fee shifting should be reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard.  Great deference is now given to the district court’s ruling.  It will now be very difficult to overturn a lower court’s determination on fee shifting, and that should encourage parties to behave a more civilly, or at least avoid clearly abusive conduct.

Specifically, in Highmark, the District Court granted Highmark’s motion for attorney fees against the patent owner Allcare Health Management System, Inc.  The District Court reasoned that Allcare had engaged in a pattern of “vexatious” and “deceitful” conduct throughout the litigation.  Specifically, it found that Allcare had pursued the current lawsuit as part of a bigger plan to identify companies potentially infringing the patent at issue under the guise of an informational survey, and then to force those companies to purchase a license for the patent at issue under threat of litigation.  Also, the District Court found that Allcare had maintained infringement claims against Highmark even though its own experts and attorneys knew that the claims were without merit and frivolous.  The Federal Circuit reversed the award of sanctions.  The Supreme Court vacated the Federal Circuit decision and remanded it to the Federal Circuit for further review under the “abuse of discretion” standard..

This opinion also revisited the issue what types of misconduct are suitable for fee shifting, an issue also recently discussed by the Court in Octane.  In particular, this case reemphasizes that an exceptional case is simply one that stands out from others with respect to the strength of the claims and the litigation tactics employed by the parties.  With this type of broad classification of exceptional cases, parties need to make a better assessment as to the quality of the claims being asserted, to avoid disfavored litigation tactics, and to treat others more civilly.  Also, there is now a strong incentive to bring cases and use litigation tactics that are within what judges normally see in their court room.

I invite you to contact me with your patent questions at (949) 433-0900. Please feel free to forward this article to your friends. As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Filed Under: Patent Damages, Patent Infringement Tagged With: attorney fees, Non-Practicing Entity

Author: James Yang

Helping entrepreneurs and mid-size businesses since 2004. Call me at (949) 433-0900 to schedule your free initial consultation. Read More…

Covid-19

Covid-19: We are fully operational.  Due to Covid-19, all meetings are conducted via zoom.

Professional Profile

James Yang Business Patent Attorney

James Yang, Patent Attorney

James Yang is a patent attorney whose practice encompasses all area of intellectual law including patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade secrets. Professional Profile

Popular Posts

  • Patent process overview
  • Patent process explained
  • How much does a patent cost?

New Book Release

Navigating the Patent System - new book by Orange County patent attorney, James Yang

Navigating the Patent System: Learn the patent process and strategies to protect your invention

Read for Free
Buy at Amazon

Peer Recognition

top attorney patent application
client choice patent application
Rated by Super Lawyers
AV Preeminent rating

RECEIVE PATENT UPDATES

Stay up to date on major changes and get tips on patent prosecution.

We respect your privacy.

Popular Posts

Patent process overview
Patent process explained
How much does a patent cost?
Trademark process and costs
Patent process and costs

 

Services

  • Patent Prosecution Services
    Patent Defense Services
    Trademark Prosecution Services
    See All Services

Contact

James Yang
OC Patent Lawyer
2372 Morse Ave., Suite #178
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 433-0900

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Sitemaps

Sitemap: Pages | Sitemap: Posts

Terms of Use

By accessing this blog, you agree that no attorney-client relationship is formed except by a subsequent written retainer agreement. Also, you agree to not send confidential information unless directed by me to do so. The information posted on this blog is legal information and not legal advice.
Complete terms of use

ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT

© 2021 · James Yang, Your Entrepreneur and Mid-Size Business Patent Attorney