Upon filing a patent application or issuance of a patent, a product disclosed by the patent application or covered by the claims of the issued patent may be marked either “Patent Pending” or “Patented” together with the patent number. The benefit of marking a product as patent pending is that it provides a warning that [...]
-
Penalty for False Patent Marking
-
Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
After an inventor conceives of an invention, an application seeking patent protection may be filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The first or initial patent application may either be a provisional or non provisional patent application.
The provisional patent application is described as a lower cost option compared to the non-provisional patent application. [...] -
What Types of Inventions are Obvious?
Inventors frequently ask whether the Patent Office will grant them a patent on their invention. The general answer is that the Patent Office will grant a patent on inventions that are novel (i.e., new) and non-obvious in light of technology existing at the time the patent application was filed. The government does not have an [...]
Conflicting Invention Assignment Clauses
In conflicting invention assignment agreements, the “does hereby assign” language of Cetus’ Agreement was operative to immediately assign the invention and vest title of the invention to Cetus instead of the inventor’s employer – Stanford.
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...
Print This Post
- Posted in: assignments, ownership
- Continue Reading →
Adjusting Patent Term Due to Delays
Generally, the basic term of a patent is either 20 years from the filing date of the patent application or 17 years from the issue date of the patent whichever is greater. However, there are many variations from the basic term. For example, the patent term for a continuation patent is calculated not from its [...]
(No Ratings Yet) Loading ... Print This Post
- Posted in: Uncategorized
- Continue Reading →
Penalty for False Patent Marking
Upon filing a patent application or issuance of a patent, a product disclosed by the patent application or covered by the claims of the issued patent may be marked either “Patent Pending” or “Patented” together with the patent number. The benefit of marking a product as patent pending is that it provides a warning that [...]
(No Ratings Yet) Loading ... Print This Post
- Posted in: Featured, patent marking
- Continue Reading →
Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
After an inventor conceives of an invention, an application seeking patent protection may be filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The first or initial patent application may either be a provisional or non provisional patent application.
The provisional patent application is described as a lower cost option compared to the non-provisional patent application. [...]
(No Ratings Yet) Loading ... Print This Post
- Posted in: Featured, Uncategorized
- Continue Reading →
Public Use Bars Patent Protection Unless Such Use is an Experiment
Under U.S. patent laws, a patent application must be filed within one year of first publicly using the invention, offering the invention for sale or distributing a printed publication. The following case illustrates an example of a device that was not used in public view but still considered to be a public use.
In New Railhead [...]
(No Ratings Yet) Loading ... Print This Post
Cease and desist letters
Once a patent issues, the patentee has a right to demand that others infringing on the claimed invention stop using, selling, offering for sale, manufacturing and importing the claimed invention into the United States. While not required, one of the first steps involved in exercising the patentee’s rights may involve sending a cease and desist [...]
(No Ratings Yet) Loading ... Print This Post
- Posted in: Infringement
- Continue Reading →
Disclose Information Related to Your Invention
After a patent application is filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, each individual involved with the patent application has a duty to disclose information that is material to the patentability of the invention. Failure to disclose all material information coupled with an intent to mislead the Patent Office may jeopardize the validity [...]
(2 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5) Loading ... Print This Post
- Posted in: Uncategorized
- Continue Reading →
Rescission of Proposed Rules to Continuation and Claims Practice
The rules regarding continuation practice and claim practice which were proposed and would have been implemented in 2007 have been enjoined ever since. On September 21, 2009, the Patent Office with GlaxoSmithKline and Dr. Tafas filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal and vacate the judgment of the district court since the Patent Office [...]
(No Ratings Yet) Loading ... Print This Post
- Posted in: Uncategorized
- Continue Reading →
Interview the Examiner Prior to First Office Action
The Patent Office has continued the First Action Interview Pilot Program effective October 1, 2009 until April 1, 2010. During the examination process, the examiner assigned to a patent application typically does not hold an interview with the applicant until after the examiner renders an initial Office Action. An interview prior to the [...]
(No Ratings Yet) Loading ... Print This Post
- Posted in: Interviews
- Continue Reading →
Reverse Payments
The typical payment in a patent litigation dispute flows from the alleged infringer to the patentee. The payment may represent damages incurred by the patentee to make the patentee whole and/or a licensing royalty fee if the patentee permits the alleged infringer to continue selling the patented product or method. The following case illustrates a [...]
(2 votes, average: 3.00 out of 5) Loading ... Print This Post
- Posted in: Antitrust
- Continue Reading →
