• Home
  • About
        • Client Reviews
        • Patent Samples
        • Accolades
        • About Firm
        • Technologies
        • FAQs
        • Areas Served
  • Services
    • Patents
      • Patent Consultation
      • Patent Search Service
      • Patent Application Service
      • Patent Prosecution
      • Utility Patents
      • Design Patents
      • Patent Defense
      • Patent Enforcement
      • Working with In-House Attorneys
    • Trademarks
      • Trademark Search
      • Trademark Application Services
      • Trademark Prosecution
      • Trademark Enforcement
      • Trademark Defense
    • Licensing
    • Worldwide IP
    • Risk Management
    • Due Diligence
  • Industries
        • Browse Patent Samples
        • Artificial Intelligence (AI) Patents
        • Automotive Patents
        • Construction Patents
        • Consumer Products Patents
        • Electronics Patents
        • Energy & Power Patents
        • Food, Beverage, & Other Culinary Patents
        • Manufacturing Patents
        • Medical Products & Devices Patents
        • Mechanical & Machinery Patents
        • Optics Patents
        • Packaging Patents
        • Software & App Patents
        • Sports Equipment
        • Tools & Equipment Patents
        • Transportation
        • Water & Environmental Patents
  • Learning Resources
    • First-Time Inventor?
    • Essential Patent Strategies
    • Making Smart Choices for Your Ideas
    • Patent FAQs
    • Why Patent Your Invention in a Bad Economy?
    • Videos on Patents
    • Articles
  • Search 180+ Articles
    • Overview of Patent Process
      • Patent process timeline and major milestones
      • Patent Process: Invention to Patent Granted (Simplified)
      • Patent process, overall steps and procedures
    • Overview of the examination process within the USPTO
      • Highs and lows of securing patent protection for your invention
      • What is the Patent Office procedure after filing a patent application?
    • Benefits of a Patent Search
      • What is a patent search and How to do it?
    • Patent attorneys, agents and the USPTO can help with the patent process
    • USPTO Website
    • What is an NDA and when to use them?
    • How to use a contract to protect your invention?
    • Working with others without losing your IP rights
    • Patent Assignments for Independent Contractors
    • Losing Invention Rights When Hiring or Collaborating with Others
    • Avoid Problems: Get an Invention Assignment Agreement
    • Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
    • Do you need to get your patent attorney to sign an NDA?
    • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
    • Four types of intellectual property to protect your idea and how to use them
      • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
      • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
      • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
      • Benefits of Patent Protection
      • Best uses for design patents
    • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
      • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
      • File a patent application before telling others about the invention
    • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
      • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
    • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
      • What is a continuation patent application?
    • How to respond to an office action?
    • Request for non-publication of a patent application
    • Anatomy of a Patent Document
    • How to write a broad patent application?
    • Design patents: pros and cons
    • How much does it cost to get a utility patent?
    • Provisional Patent Application: Cheap Alternative?
    • Patent Cost Framework and cash flow
    • Provisional patent application: a cheap option?
    • Cheap provisional patent applications
    • Patent infringement
      • Basics of writing a patent claim for a patent application
      • Patent Marking: Everything you wanted to know
      • Avoiding Patent Infringement
      • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product?
      • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product? (Design Patent)
    • Pros and cons of securing worldwide patent protection and their steps
    • Foreign patent filing to secure protection in other countries
    • Overview of Office Actions
    • Trademark Registration: common law, state and federal
    • How to obtain a federal trademark registration?
    • How to select a trademark?
      • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Info on Forms
        • What Forms to File with the USPTO When Submitting a Patent Application
        • Application Data Sheet
        • Nonpublication Request
        • Rescind Nonpublication Request
        • Declaration of Utility or Design Application
        • Provisional Patent Application Cover Sheet
        • Information Disclosure Statement (IDS)
        • After Final Consideration Pilot Program
  • Schedule Consultation
  • Contact

Top-Rated Orange County Patent Lawyer | Helping Inventors in Orange County, Los Angeles County & Beyond | OC Patent Lawyer, Irvine CA

Orange County Patent Attorney

(949) 433-0900
You are here: Home / Patent application process / Before filing a patent application / Use Explicit Descriptions to Meet the Written Description Requirement

Use Explicit Descriptions to Meet the Written Description Requirement

January 30, 2012 by James Yang

Written Description Requirement

To get a patent, an inventor must satisfy the written description requirement.  This is accomplished through the preparation of a patent application that describes the invention and shows any drawings if necessary for the understanding of the invention.  To satisfy the written description requirement, the discussion of the invention must correspond to the claims.  Otherwise, the claims will be deemed invalid for failing to satisfy the written description requirement.

Present Invention

The invention at issue in the following case reduces the amount of aluminum (i.e, metal usage) in a soda can.  Crown Packaging v. Ball Metal.  <insert link to case>.  The soda can has a can body and a can end which is attached to the can body.  The patent application describes two different areas which can be modified to reduce the amount of aluminum used compared to prior art cans.  These two areas are the chuck wall 24 and the reinforcing bead 25.  The present invention increased the angle of the chuck wall 24 and narrowed the width of the reinforcing bead 25 compared to the prior art cans.

Written Description Issue

The claims of the patents at issue had broad claims directed to one of the features but not both.  In particular, the independent claims were broadly written so as to be directed only to the large-angle chuck wall 24 regardless of the width of the reinforcing bead.  The defendant (Ball Metal) argued that the claim did not satisfy the written description requirement because the specification did not describe an embodiment that was directed only to the large angle chuck wall 24 but instead always discussed the invention in relation to both the large angle of the chuck wall 24 and the narrow reinforcing bead 25.  The district court agreed but on appeal, the Federal Circuit reversed.

Inspection of the structure of the claim set saves the day

The Federal Circuit reversed based on its review of the specification and the structure of the claim set of the patent application.  With respect to the specification, the Federal Circuit stated that “Nowhere does the specification teach that metal saving can only be achieved by increasing the chuck wall angle along with narrowing the reinforcing bead.”  (emphasis added).  With respect to the claim structure, the Federal Circuit noted that the original independent claims were directed to the chuck wall angle without reference to the narrow reinforcing bead and that the narrow reinforcing bead limitation was added as a dependent claim.  The claims show that the applicant had in mind the invention as claimed, namely, a large angle chuck wall regardless of the size of the reinforcing bead.  Hence, the written description requirement was met by implying such reading through the context of the text and the drawings of the patent application.

Present case distinguished from three prior cases

Furthermore, Ball Metal (defendant) argued that the patent did not satisfy the written description requirement for the same reasons discussed in relation to three prior cases, namely, Tronzo v. Biomet, LizardTech, and ICU Med. v. Alaris Med. Sys.  The Federal Circuit distinguished these cases from the instant case by stating that the patents at issue in these cases unambiguously limited the scope of the invention.  In Tronzo, the patent application discussed a feature as being an extremely important aspect.  LizardTech described only one specific method for solving one particular problem.  In the patent at issue in the current litigation, the patentee (Crown) described at least two different ways of solving the problem of metal usage.  In ICU Medical, the patent application described a feature as necessary.

Divided court

A three-panel judge decided the current case.  The majority made up of Newman (Circuit Judge) and Whyte (Circuit Judge) reversed the District Court’s decision.  However, Dyk (Circuit Judge) dissented from the majority opinion.  Dyk opined that the patent application failed to satisfy the written description requirement because it failed to explicitly describe the large-angle chuck wall regardless of the width of the reinforcing bead width.

Patent drafting strategy

Although not required by the majority, it is recommended to make explicit statements of aspects that are considered to be implied by the text of the patent application with the goal of trying to avoid litigation. Accordingly, the patent drafting strategy is to meet the higher standard put forth by the dissent and if anything is missing from the patent application, rely on the reasoning put forth by the majority.  For example, a brief paragraph that states that elements 1, 2, and 3 may be practiced in any combination with each other or individually may be made explicitly in the patent application to explain that the inventor contemplates the following combinations 1 and 2, 1 and 3, 2 and 3, or 1, 2 or 3 individually.  Oftentimes, this is the area that is deficient in patent applications prepared by laypersons.  The simple rule is to try to make explicit things that are implicit in the text.

I invite you to contact me with your patent questions at (949) 433-0900 or [email protected]. Please feel free to forward this article to your friends. As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego, and surrounding cities.

Author

James Yang is a patent attorney. For more than 16 years, James Yang has been representing clients to secure patent protection for their inventions and register trademarks to protect their brands. If you need help, call him at (949) 433-0900. Read More…

Patent Book

Navigating the Patent System - new book by Orange County patent attorney, James Yang

Navigating the Patent System: Learn the patent process and strategies to protect your invention

Read for Free
Buy at Amazon

RECEIVE PATENT ARTICLES

Stay up to date on major changes and get tips on the patent process.

We respect your privacy.

Popular Posts

4 steps in the patent process
Patent process overview
Patent process explained
How much does a patent cost?
Trademark process and costs
Patent process and costs
Four types of intellectual property
Selling an idea without a patent
How to check if a product is patented

Services

Patent Consultations
Patent Searches
Patent Applications
Utility Patents
Design Patents
Patent Prosecution Services
Patent Defense Services
Patent-Law Counsel for In-House Attorneys
Trademark Overview
Trademark Search Services
Trademark Application Services
Trademark Prosecution Services
Trademark Enforcement Services
Trademark Defense Services
See All Services

Industries

Automotive Patents
Consumer Products Patents
Culinary Patents
Manufacturing Patents
Medical Patents
Optics Patents
Software & App Patents
See All Industries

amunra casino

Contact

James Yang
OC Patent Lawyer
2372 Morse Ave., Suite #178
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 433-0900

Sitemaps

Sitemap: Pages | Sitemap: Posts

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

By accessing this blog, you agree that no attorney-client relationship is formed except by a subsequent written retainer agreement. Also, you agree to not send confidential information unless directed by me to do so. The information posted on this blog is legal information and not legal advice.
Complete Terms of Use
Complete Privacy Policy

ADA Compliance

OC Patent Lawyer aims to ensure that its services are accessible to people with disabilities.
Accessibility Statement

Service Area

From our offices in Irvine and Anaheim, California, we serve clients throughout Orange County, Los Angeles, Long Beach, the Inland Empire (e.g. Corona and Temecula), and throughout SoCal.

© 2025 · James Yang, Your Entrepreneur and Mid-Size Business Patent Attorney