• Home
  • About
    • Client Reviews
    • Patent Samples
    • Accolades
    • About Firm
    • Technologies
    • FAQs
    • Areas Served
  • Services
    • Patents
      • Patent Consultation
      • Patent Search Service
      • Patent Application Service
      • Patent Prosecution
      • Utility Patents
      • Design Patents
      • Patent Defense
      • Patent Enforcement
      • Working with In-House Attorneys
    • Trademarks
      • Trademark Search
      • Trademark Application Services
      • Trademark Prosecution
      • Trademark Enforcement
      • Trademark Defense
    • Licensing
    • Worldwide IP
    • Risk Management
    • Due Diligence
  • Industries
    • Browse Patent Samples
    • Automotive Patents
    • Construction Patents
    • Consumer Products Patents
    • Electronics Patents
    • Food, Beverage, & Other Culinary Patents
    • Manufacturing Patents
    • Medical Products & Devices Patents
    • Optics Patents
    • Software & App Patents
    • Tools & Equipment Patents
  • Learning Resources
    • First-Time Inventor?
    • Why Patent Your Invention in a Bad Economy?
    • Videos on Patents
    • Search 180+ Articles
      • Patent process
        • Overview of Patent Process
          • Patent process timeline and major milestones
          • Patent Process: Invention to Patent Granted (Simplified)
          • Patent process, overall steps and procedures
        • Overview of the examination process within the USPTO
          • Highs and lows of securing patent protection for your invention
          • What is the Patent Office procedure after filing a patent application?
        • Benefits of a Patent Search
          • What is a patent search and How to do it?
        • Patent attorneys, agents and the USPTO can help with the patent process
        • USPTO Website
      • Invention Agreements
        • What is an NDA and when to use them?
        • How to use a contract to protect your invention?
        • Working with others without losing your IP rights
        • Patent Assignments for Independent Contractors
        • Losing Invention Rights When Hiring or Collaborating with Others
        • Avoid Problems: Get an Invention Assignment Agreement
      • Protect Inventions
        • Misconceptions of Provisional Patent Applications
        • Do you need to get your patent attorney to sign an NDA?
        • Can a confidentiality agreement protect me like a patent application?
        • Four types of intellectual property to protect your idea and how to use them
          • Overview of Patents and Intellectual Property
          • Patent protection benefits and why every inventor should consider getting one
          • 8 tips to successfully protect your idea
          • Benefits of Patent Protection
          • Best uses for design patents
        • Reasons to only market your invention after securing patent pendency
          • Dangers of 1 yr grace period under first-inventor-to-file system
          • File a patent application before telling others about the invention
        • Risks and benefits of securing software patent protection
          • Strategy to overcome patentable subject matter rejection
        • Pros and cons of filing a continuation-in-part application
          • What is a continuation patent application?
      • How Patent Applications Work: the Basics
        • How to respond to an office action?
        • Request for non-publication of a patent application
        • Anatomy of a Patent Document
        • How to write a broad patent application?
        • Design patents: pros and cons
      • Patent costs
        • How much does it cost to get a utility patent?
        • Provisional Patent Application: Cheap Alternative?
        • Patent Cost Framework and cash flow
        • Provisional patent application: a cheap option?
        • Cheap provisional patent applications
      • Patent infringement
        • Basics of writing a patent claim for a patent application
        • Patent Marking: Everything you wanted to know
        • Avoiding Patent Infringement
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product?
        • Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product? (Design Patent)
      • Worldwide patents
        • Pros and cons of securing worldwide patent protection and their steps
        • Foreign patent filing to secure protection in other countries
      • Responding to Office Actions
        • Overview of Office Actions
      • Trademarks
        • Trademark Registration: common law, state and federal
        • How to obtain a federal trademark registration?
        • How to select a trademark?
          • Protect your idea when pitching to an investor, potential licensee, or buyer
  • Info on Forms
    • Nonpublication Request
    • Declaration of Utility or Design Application
    • Provisional Patent Application Cover Sheet
    • After Final Consideration Pilot Program
  • Schedule Consultation
  • Contact

Top-Rated Orange County Patent Lawyer | Helping Inventors in Orange County, Los Angeles County & Beyond | OC Patent Lawyer, Irvine CA

Orange County Patent Attorney

(949) 433-0900
You are here: Home / Patent application process / After Filing a Patent Application / Solution for Dealing with “Unrelated” Prior Art

Solution for Dealing with “Unrelated” Prior Art

November 11, 2010 by James Yang

During the examination of a patent, an examiner searches a number of databases in search of “analogous” prior art references that either disclose the same or is sufficiently close to the invention so that the examiner can make a determination of patentability of the invention.  At times, a reference cited by the USPTO may appear to be unrelated to the invention (or non-analogous prior art) being examined.  For example, lock technology appears to be unrelated to truck hitches.  However, these two seemingly unrelated technologies might be “related” under the legal definition of “analogous” prior art.

The Patent Office as well as the courts define analogous prior art references as those references within the same field of endeavor as the claimed invention.  If the reference is not within the same field of endeavor, then the prior art reference is still analogous if the reference is reasonably pertinent to the particular problem with which the inventor was concerned.  In 2005, the Supreme Court decided KSR which instructed the courts to broadly construe the definition of “analogous” art, stating that “familiar items may have obvious uses beyond their primary purposes.”

The following case applies the Supreme Court’s instruction to construe the scope of “analogous” art broadly.  In Wyers v. Master Lock (Fed. Cir. July 22, 2010), the patent at issue related to hitch pin locks that secure trailers to motor vehicles.  The patented pin had a sleeve that could be placed over the pin to enlarge the diameter of the pin so that the hitch pin can be used with hitch receivers having different pin holes.  The hitch pin also had a sealed lock to prevent internal contamination.

The court reviewed whether two prior art references, namely, a sleeve reference and a seal reference were “analogous”.  The sleeve reference was directed to a trailer-towing application, adaptable to “a motor vehicle such as an automobile for towing.”  Hence, the Court held that the sleeve reference is analogous prior art since it is related to the same field of endeavor as the patent at issue.

The seal reference disclosed a typical padlock which had a seal for preventing internal contamination.  The Court held that even if this reference is not within the same field of endeavor as the patent at issue, the seal reference is “analogous” since the seal reference is directed toward the same problem the inventor was trying to solve – mitigating internal contamination.

Based on this case, it is substantially harder to succeed in making the non-analogous art argument in order to convince the examiner that the cited reference should not be used to reject the claimed invention.  As an alternate argument, the solution may be to convince the examiner that the cited unrelated prior art reference “teaches away” from the claimed invention so that there is no motivation to combine the references cited by the examiner.  If the cited reference is truly unrelated then it has been my experience that there typically is some statement or fact in the cited reference that could be used to show that the reference “teaches away” from your invention.

I invite you to contact me regarding your patent questions at (949) 433-0900 or [email protected].  Please feel free to forward this article to your friends.  As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Author

James Yang is a patent attorney. For more than 16 years, James Yang has been representing clients to secure patent protection for their inventions and register trademarks to protect their brands. If you need help, call him at (949) 433-0900. Read More…

Popular Posts

  • Patent process overview
  • Patent process explained
  • How much does a patent cost?
  • Why patent your invention in a bad economy?

Patent Book

Navigating the Patent System - new book by Orange County patent attorney, James Yang

Navigating the Patent System: Learn the patent process and strategies to protect your invention

Read for Free
Buy at Amazon

RECEIVE PATENT ARTICLES

Stay up to date on major changes and get tips on the patent process.

We respect your privacy.

Popular Posts

Patent process overview
Patent process explained
How much does a patent cost?
Trademark process and costs
Patent process and costs

 

Services

Patent Consultations
Patent Searches
Patent Applications
Utility Patents
Design Patents
Patent Prosecution Services
Patent Defense Services
Patent-Law Counsel for In-House Attorneys
Trademark Overview
Trademark Search Services
Trademark Application Services
Trademark Prosecution Services
Trademark Enforcement Services
Trademark Defense Services
See All Services

Industries

Automotive Patents
Consumer Products Patents
Culinary Patents
Manufacturing Patents
Medical Patents
Optics Patents
Software & App Patents
See All Industries

Contact

James Yang
OC Patent Lawyer
2372 Morse Ave., Suite #178
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 433-0900

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Sitemaps

Sitemap: Pages | Sitemap: Posts

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

By accessing this blog, you agree that no attorney-client relationship is formed except by a subsequent written retainer agreement. Also, you agree to not send confidential information unless directed by me to do so. The information posted on this blog is legal information and not legal advice.
Complete Terms of Use
Complete Privacy Policy

ADA Compliance

OC Patent Lawyer aims to ensure that its services are accessible to people with disabilities.
Accessibility Statement

Service Area

From our office in Irvine, California, we serve clients throughout Orange County, Los Angeles, Long Beach, the Inland Empire (e.g. Corona and Temecula), and throughout SoCal.

© 2023 · James Yang, Your Entrepreneur and Mid-Size Business Patent Attorney