In order to ensure maximum compensation for any infringements on your patents, your products should include a clear patent marking to show that they are protected. Let's dive-in: Patent marking provides constructive notice to the public of your patent. Constructive notice is given to the public of your patent by affixing the patent number on the patented product. By doing … [Read more...]
Can I Copy My Competitor’s Product?
Development of new product lines Businesses track new products and developments of their competitors. They attend trade shows, receive information from mutual clients about new products offered by others. In response, companies may attempt to introduce a competitive alternative. In doing so, they may reverse engineer (i.e., purchase and take apart) their competitors … [Read more...]
Irreparable harm easier to prove for grant of patent based injunction
One of the difficulties of securing a patent based injunction was that it was difficult to prove that the harm to the patent owner was irreparable or that monetary compensation was not enough to make the patent owner whole due to the infringement of the patent. In Metalcraft v. Toro Co. (Fed. Cir. 2017), the Federal Circuit provided a basis for establishing irreparable harm … [Read more...]
Active inducement of infringement in physician patient relationships
Background In Eli Lilly v. Teva (Fed. Cir. 2017), the patent owner (Eli Lilly) sued Teva under a theory of active inducement of infringement. In particular, the patent owner asserted that Teva induced others to infringe Eli Lilly’s patent (U.S. Pat. No. 7,772,209). Teva was not accused of directly infringing the patent itself, but instead was accused of indirectly infringing … [Read more...]
Process patent blocks importation of product
1. Process patent may be used to block importation of products made with patented method steps Everything begins and ends with the claim set since the claims define the scope of protection afforded under the patent and to a large extent also drive the structure of the patent application. The claims are generally directed to the product or process of the use, manufacture, etc. … [Read more...]
CAFC defines competitive injury for false patent marking
In order to unfairly deter competition, companies would falsely mark a product as “patent pending” or even place a patent number on the product when no patent application or patent existed. This is referred to as false patent marking. Sometimes companies would make an innocent mistake and falsely mark their products as patent protected. Click here for proper usage of patent … [Read more...]
Attacking patent claims as indefinite made easier
In Interval Licensing, LLC v. AOL, Inc. (Fed. Cir. Sept. 10, 2014), the Federal Circuit invalidated a patent claim as being indefinite under a new standard set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Biosig v. Nautilus (S. Ct. April 28, 2014). Interval Licensing is instructional not just for evaluating indefiniteness under the new standard, but also on how to write … [Read more...]
Everyone in the supply chain could be sued for patent infringement
Patent owners can sue anyone up and down the chain of distribution for infringement of patent. Manufacturers, distributors and end users are all possible litigants. For example, the end user can be sued for using the patented invention. The distributor can be sued for selling the patented invention. The manufacturer can be sued for making and selling the patented invention. … [Read more...]